Skip to main content

Canada Trade -- Not that good but better than a kick in the face

From David Rosenberg:

Canada posted a very small surplus of $200 million, which was below the $600 million consensus estimate and again, two-way trade deflated with exports down 1% and imports down a sharper 2.2% (these are in nominal terms). In volume terms, imports were flat while exports fell 1.6% in what was the second contraction in the real trade balance in a row. Upside growth risks for Canadian Q2 GDP are subsiding — if fact, we are at 3.3% (annual rate) right now versus 3.6% as per the consensus and we believe the risks are to the downside, especially in light of the weak May housing data.

Bottom line is that Canada's economy is doing okK, internal demand is good, oil price around $75 is keeping the CAD near the 1.03/97 level (again the Petro-currency effect).  But with 40% of the GDP depending on exports the signs are poor for export demand.

The Chinese numbers for May trade were excellent (up 48%) so we may be seeing a decoupling of the Asian economies (I wish) although in my heart I know that things just don't work out that way....Canada's dilemma is that  all levels of governments have (rightly) undertaken economic tightening which will impact GDP growth.  Q4 2009 and Q1 2010 were extremely strong, but already the numbers for Q2/2010 are looking more "iffy" we shall see.

In November 2009 my prediction was for Canada's GDP to grow by 3.2% in 2010, based on a number of factors (healthy financial sector, housing market strength, and raw material demand stable to strong).  The first half of the year has more or less delivered to goods (steel, aluminum, copper are still relatively high).  Still this is an illustration of the weakness of the recovery, that every Canada which has no suffered nearly as much as the other G7 countries, sees its GDP second half target growth probably around 1%.

Aside from that have a good weekend

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu