Skip to main content

Canadian Productivity Revisited

I have often written about productivity here in Canada  (here, here and here).  Part of the problem is that with the U.S. economy next door, Canada's performance has almost always lagged, and no one seems to know why this occurs.  there are many theories, and I know for a fact that the are hundred of articles in Canadian literature as to why it lagged and how it can be improved by the "right policy".


In fact, provincial and federal governments have tried all kinds of policies to get productivity to rise with little success, and when it does suddenly rise (as it did early in 2009) the reason is unexplained and it is evident that no policies were in place.


There are four factors which drive productivity; Canada has structural weakness in two of the four:

(1)               Innovation and Technology:  Canada is a small open economy.  Its small size, labor market inflexibility and stronger union make this force weaker in Canada.
(2)               Specialist knowledge workers;  Canada is a country of generalist, specialists are often attracted away from Canada to other markets
(3)               Reallocation of resources:  Canada has suffered far fewer, and less severe recessions – creative destruction has had less impact here.
(4)               Globalization as a tool of market expansion: Canada, is one of the world’s most open economies, and should be able to improve productivity because of its growing markets.

Canada’s disadvantage because of a stronger currency can only be alleviated by better productivity.  A constant headache for Canadian policy makers, who have noted that for years Canadian labor productivity has lagged that of the US.  The number of studies on Canadian productivity’s shortfall is too numerous to count. 

Policy has tried to accommodate the needs of industry, remove impediments to increased productivity.  Maybe the treat of a stronger dollar is the only real incentive to Canadian entrepreneurs to increase productivity.




As an example, in 2009 the province with the "best score" in terms of increased productivity was Quebec, and yet it is the province that saw the lowest fall in employment, and the mildest recession (mainly because in 2005 the Quebec government enacted a massive infrastructure spending program).  One aspect of the data available from StatsCan is that at time they give you information that allows you to infer trends.  Quebec entrepreneur have been wary of the strength of the Canadian dollar for some time, and have made a decision to invest in technology (you can see the increase in imports of machine tools), that helps a growing economy.

It could be that because of this decision to invest in their business, they were able to multiply labor productivity.  Although as can be seem from the chart above, we still have a long way to go.

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process
Post a Comment
Read more

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki
Post a Comment
Read more

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu
Post a Comment
Read more