Skip to main content

China Slowdown: What does it mean?

First, this is a long post, my point is that the anticipated slow down of China – due to its inflation worries – will negatively impact the Canadian economy.

A few months ago, Jim Chanos, president and founder of Kynikos Associates, a New York City investment company said that there was a property bubble in China, evidence was that there are 65 million homes in China that are not connected to the electrical grid – therefore no one lives there (See here and here).  There was a great deal of skepticism as to his views, but what is important was that Chanos said that he was not shorting China (despite his perception that a contraction was in the cards), rather, Chanos said that since shorting China was “impractical” he would short first and second derivatives assets.

What does this mean?  Well it means that if you believe that China will slow down, the demand for many raw materials will fall, as will their price, hence shorting the stock of firms that are active in these sectors, you achieve the same objective (as shorting China).  Yes dear reader, here comes Canada and Australia – the great commodity suppliers.  Obviously, Australia is directly impacted by a slow down in China, since it exports a great deal to the Middle Kingdom, but all materials are fungible, and therefore when steel, Copper, oil prices drop, both countries will be directly affected.  On the bight side these are not massive employers, but the impact on government revenues cannot be underestimated.

Consensus is now moving towards a Chinese slow down, because of growing inflation pressures the Chinese government fears unemployment but it fears inflation much more.  Looking back trough Chinese history it is inflation that has been the most destabilizing factor for the political class (the riots of 1987 – which culminated in the Tiananmen Square protest were first caused by high inflation).

Last week one of the most interesting economic analysts in China Michael Pettis made three assertions about growth over the next few years:

  • Global demand growth over the next several years is likely to be anemic with or without China.
  • If China's trade surplus contracts, it will provide an expansionary boost to the rest of the world, not a contractionary one.
  • A slowdown in Chinese growth might not be the disaster for the world that many believe.
Uneven Consequences

Point number one is a given. I agree with point number two and three although I can see how many would disagree. The devil of course is in the details, and that's where I possibly differ from Pettis. It's hard to say for sure because he did not expound on country-to-country differences.

This is how I see it.

China is clearly overheating (see above commentary on housing), the slow down will halt the pressure on commodities and their prices.

For the U.S. falling oil and commodity prices would help reduce the US trade deficit, especially if grain prices remain firm. Falling energy, copper, and metal prices would help US homebuilders and small businesses hurt in a price squeeze of rising input prices and falling prices of goods and services. The net effect of this would be to strengthen the US dollar, yet help the US economy (BTW, American inflation will continue to be very low).  A slow down in China will impact corporation ad the stock market.  It may even but a dampener on Congress’ protectionist streak (one can hope, right).

Australia and Canada Will Suffer

Australia and Canada with their housing bubbles already poised to implode would suffer mightily if commodity prices tumble.  Resources account for nearly 1/3 of the country's GDP, a great deal of investments have been made in oil and gas while assuming energy prices in excess of $70 bbl.  What happens if oil prices drop by $30 to the mid 50s or 60s?  the impact would be hard.  In other primary resource sectors the same problem would arise.  

Given that the US and Europe are far more important globally, A slowdown in China might be a net benefit for the world "in general", yet a total disaster for countries overly dependent on continuous strong growth in China.

Australia and Canada would be especially hard hit, right at the worst possible time.

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu