Skip to main content

Financial System Review – December 2010

Twice a year the Bank of Canada undertakes a review of the major risks facing Canada’s financial system, being the arbiter between a small open economy and the rest of the world, the Bank looks at where the “trouble” could emerge.  The December commentary (here) makes for somewhat disturbing reading.

The BoC has three main concerns:  First, Europe’s debt market disintegration, second the growing “imbalances” across the world.  Finally, the Bank is concerned with the level of personal debt in Canada.  Their fear is that any one of these three elements could cause a demand shock in Canada, that these risks are more important today then they were six months ago, and that this could have consequences for the stability of Canada’s financial system.

The instability which the BoC refers to is driven first by America’s decision to follow Keynesian “pump priming” fiscal and monetary policies, which at best are only delaying the inevitable, and a worse make the situation even more precarious and difficult to resolve.  Specifically, the BoC suggest that America needs to reduce consumption (increase savings) and that China & Germany (biggest surplus countries) need to implement policies that encourage domestic consumption (Every surplus is a deficit elsewhere).  The Bank’s blunt assessment arises from Canada’s fear (as the U.S. largest trade partner) that it will be caught in the cross-fire of a trade war brewing between the U.S. and China.

Ireland and Greece are already beyond redemption with debt/GDP at levels that will eventually require write offs (ok the BoC doesn’t actually say that, because they cannot). More debt will not resolve the problem of excessive debt!  For those who though the problems would only have to be addressed in 2013 (when the ECB credit facilities expire) as of this morning 100% of the Irish, and Greek bond market’s bids are from the ECB, no one else is buying (see here).  The question is what happens if Belgium and Spain get sucked under (each accounting for more than 10% of Europe GDP – and with bond markets beyond the ability of the ECB to intervene).

The third element of the Bank’s worries gravitated over the level of Canadians’ indebtedness.  It has been widely reported that Canadians continue to borrow more quickly than their incomes are rising (partly fueling a very “healthy” housing market).  This is the one puzzle piece over which the Bank has some ability to affect changes.  I would not be surprised; following discreet conversation between the Bank and Canada’s banking executives, if there was not some tightening of lending standards. If this doesn’t work, the bank can always force Canadian banks to increase reserves.  Their final tool, and the bluntest, would be for the Bank of Canada to raise interest rates, although in view of the global weakness, this tool is probably off the table until March 2011.

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process
Post a Comment
Read more

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki
Post a Comment
Read more

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu
Post a Comment
Read more