Skip to main content

What happens to Canada if the US gets into real economic trouble?

Last night president Obama made a deal with the GOP to make the Bush tax cuts permanent.  Sure the extension is for two years, but the employment situation in American will not improve (estimates are for unemployment rates to drop by 0.3% and 0.6% they are at 9.8% now) and the likelihood that Obama will win a second mandate (there could even be a challenger for his job) appear much lower.  Democrats feel betrayed (he ran on a platform of no extensions), and independents now realize that the GOP has the real power so may as well give them the whole thing after all!

Republicans are very bad at cutting spending, Social Security, Medicare and Defense are off the table for the GOP (in view of their supporter’s demographics and philosophy), problem is that with interest expenses these four items account for 77% of the U.S. government total budget.  Moreover, healthcare costs are rising at more than 4 times the rate of inflation.  Renewing the "Bush" tax cuts (rechristen "the tax cuts" since they are also Obama's now) sends the Federal deficit the 10% of GDP threshold, the same as Greece.
 


Now America is not Greece, but eventually the reality of massive deficit will hamper America’s ability in financing its deficit.  My guess is that Canada has about a decade before things come to a head.  Canada has been warned – America will not take any strategic decision unless its back is against the wall. 

Should Canada economic policy encourage exporters to diversify export destination away from America

There are a number of step that the Canadian government can take, most will actually generate savings:

(1)               Instruct Canada’s Export development Corporation that it should apply more stringent solvency tests when dealing with American Importers.
(2)               Facilitate the growth of trade with Asia (which is already occurring).
(3)               Provide “translation” grants so that Canadian corporations can offset some of the foreign language translation costs.
(4)               Improve the scope of Canada’s trade missions in Asia 
(5)               Promote the construction of an additional pipeline to the West Coast to support the export of Oil and gas products to other markets (instead of building an additional pipeline to the US).

Language barriers are a key issue for Canadian corporation dealing with non-North American consumer.  Moreover, the focus of these efforts can be limited to manufactured goods, since raw material and energy are fungible.

Thankfully, America’s elected officials are almost certain to help in this process.  Anti trade legislation is making its way through congress, with broad support from both parties – who have different constituencies but similar agendas.

Canada has a decade to reduce its dependency on the American market, already over the past 15 years the importance of America as our trading partners has grown for 2/3 of all exports to ¾.

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu