Skip to main content

Canada Vs. the United States

According to the press, Michael Bachmann candidate for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination said that Canada was doing better than the U.S. and that the Conservative government had not provided any stimulus to the economy.

Now, we know here that in early 2008, the Prime Minister Harper (and his finance minister) where rather keen to provide only minimal stimulus to the economy, but as a minority government they were “forced” to implement a more aggressive package (strike one for Bachmann – but then she’s about as uninformed as can be, a true blowhard!). In retrospect, I suspect that Harper and Flaherty were happy to bend to the demand of the opposition parties.

Canada did in fact implement a $40 billion economic recovery package of governmental spending. In Quebec, where I live, there is no doubt that the participation of the Federal Government in several programs helped greatly (the bulk of Canada’s Federal government spending are indirect). Quebec had long announced (and planned) a huge infrastructure program (literally our bridges were falling down, and killing people!), the impact of all the Federal money was to mute the recession impact in Quebec, to a point where it went almost unnoticed!

There is no doubt that the action of the Canadian Federal government and of the Bank of Canada (which provided liquidity to the Canadian banks) was key in keeping the economy from excessive contraction. However, other factors were more important: (1) Canada’s housing recovered from a short term price dip to reach even higher (bubble) levels, (2) construction and investment reached unprecedented peaks (all segments: commercial, retail and housing). (3) Canadian banks had few bad loans as the economy continued to grow, and (4) “Emerging Economies” continue to demand raw material – a core activity to Canada’s economy.

The reality is that $40 billion in a $1.5 trillion economy is only 3%, and that this money was spent over several years, contributing no more than 0.75% to GDP – helpful, but not the core element to Canada’s success (sofar).

Canada now finds itself in the same position that the U.S. did 4 years ago; excessive mortgage debt, excessive personal borrowing (and income has been rising in Canada). Eventually, like all roller coaster the market would have to return to long term normal. But to say that Canada’s conservative government did not help during the crisis would be wrong.

Today unemployment in Canada stands at 7.4% (May), whereas it stands at 9.1% in the U.S. -- if we compare unemployment the same way as the U.S. it is actually a full 1% lower. Capacity utilization is nearer to the historical average, and strikes are growing in number (Air Canada & Canada Post) as tightness in the labor market is rising. Canada’s economy is very different to that of the U.S. – Just 15 years ago the S&P 500 was a good proxy for the Canadian (TSX60) this is no longer the case. Finally, the Canadian government is looking to achieve a balance budget by 2014! The Bank of Canada withdrew its liquidity support 14 months after the beginning of the crisis (a fact largely unnoticed by bank observers across the world). Canada is far from perfect, we make jokes at the expense of our American neighbors – especially with regards to their inefficient health care system, but we often forget that here in Canada health care costs are rising substantially faster than inflation – and Governments accounts for nearly 100% of all health care expenses. Our housing market is beginning to exhibit all the signs of overheating (frankly in some areas bubbles), and our successes are exogenous – it is the energy buyers, the raw material buyers that have propelled Canada’s economy, the massive advantage of a small open economy, but should China slow down, or the rest of the world see a falling demand for raw materials, and Canada’s fortune would be greatly affected.

That’s our reality

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu