Skip to main content

THe Canadian dollar



I realize that I’ve not written anything about the loonie in a while (as the CAD is affectionately known here in the great white north – because of the image of the loon on side of the dollar coin).  The reason is that the CAD “weakness” was obvious caused by oil prices falling of the cliff (correlation is around .85 – there are issues with the correlation when the CAD nears parity – one way or the other that break down the relationship).  Guess what has been happening to both oil prices and the CAD over the past few trading sessions:  You got it they’re both gone up.  The CAD was trading around parity for about a month as the perception of the U.S. economy was the recession was at the door step.
 
The only thing that has changed (aside from higher oil prices – although not NatGas prices) is the Jackson Hole last week, where the Fed Chairman’s “non” statement was perceived by everyone as a sign that things were going their way (what ever way that was – those who saw positive sign of QE3 and those who saw no sign of QE3 both started buying stocks – and gold by the way).

Note that as far as I am concerned the difficulties faced by the American economy (Canada’s No 1 export market) have not subsided.  In fact, virtually all indicators are saying the same thing – the U.S. is in for a rough second half (not that the first was so much fun).  Virtually all metrics are down – and some are down by historically wide margins (today it was consumer confidence – biggest monthly drop – ever). 

This should mean that the CAD recent strength will reverse soon, which every Canadian economist is expecting, because if American (and Europe is in even worse shape by the way) then demand for oil will drop – yes emerging economies account for 50% of all oil demand (up from 20% a decade ago), but it remains that if Europe and America face a recession – and I really don’t see much hope for strong growth – as all G7 governments tighten at the same time, then demand for oil will fall.  Canada a maker of raw material (including oil obviously) – is a second degree casualty of the America’s slowdown (BTW my best case scenario for both America and Europe is tepid growth of 1% to 1.5% going forward as the deleveraging continues its inexorable path – only slowed down by the 2010 QE2 stimuli).

So back to Canada, right now oil prices WTI are back up around $87bbl ($89/bbl as I write), down from the nose bleed $110 it May 2011 (BTW CAD was trading at 1.05/95 then) today its around 1.02/98, back from parity 1.001/.999 just 10 days ago.  My guess is that with a Q4/2011 “expected” cut in the BoC’s director interest rates we can expect the CAD to trade at or below parity by the end of 2011 (I could be wrong in timing but not direction).

As a side note, Canada’s oft mentioned “cousin” on this blog, Australia is starting to see some rather unpleasant effect of the Chinese “slow down” with house prices coming under pressure (after nearly two decades of mind numbing price rises – Australia’s house price index is around 550, about 200 for the US and 155 for Canada – assuming a start date of 1987 for all three markets).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…