Skip to main content

If it were not so tragic it would be funny


Sunday morning heading back home from an overlong bike ride – 68km, I noticed that a nearby overpass was blocked by the police.  Since I was not planning to go near there, what kind of cretin goes to a police blockade I always wonder?  I went home had a shower and moved-on with my daily activities.  Much later I found out that once again Montreal’s crumbling infrastructure led to a near disaster.  This time there were no injuries but it was a close thing, workers where around and apparently two cars had just passed under the overpass when something like a 100 tons of concrete decided that Newton was right!

L'entrepreneur n'a pas digéré d'entendre le ministre Sam... (Photo: Hugo-Sebastien Aubert, La Presse)

This time Montrealers were lucky, but it has not always been the case.  Part of the problem is that for politicians what’s fun is building new things, but repairing them is always such a boor, plus you don’t get your picture in the paper for repairing infrastructure. 

Again, Canada’s press is full of miss-information (they’re very good at that), first was the statement that the overpass, bridges and other works were built to last 100 years – don’t know any structure (aside from damns) that are built to last a 100 years – in reality weather, and wear and tear means that structures (either in concrete or steel) have to be replaced/upgraded frequently.  The problem in Quebec (it is also true elsewhere) that money has been used for other goals.

No one thinks that providing virtually free daycare and free medication (at the very least cheap) will impact our infrastructures, but it does have a massive impact, since tax dollars can only be spent once. Our provincial politicians have clearly not been up to the job, in the last few days it emerged that a “secrete report” dating back from 2008 clearly indicated that the very structure that collapsed on Sunday was at great risk, moreover another study a year ago indicated that the situation was even worse.  BTW I am not suggesting that providing daycare is a bad idea, just that these are some of the choice that have been made by our province.

The actors:

The provincial government:  it has know for more than 3 years that the structure that collapsed was at great risk, and, until two days ago, refused to release two reports that indicated that this structure was at risk.  On the bright side, the same government has spent nearly $10 billion upgrading Quebec’s infrastructure over the past 6 years. 

The City Government:  Covered in laurels by the Montreal press, these are the same people that have worked tirelessly to delay the replacement of some of the most unstable highway structure in Montreal.  On the bight side they love mass transit, Montreal is the home of the ‘still unprofitable” Bixi – secretive and incompetent their value added in the process is minimal since the Montreal government has virtually no control over its revenues (Provincial subsidies) and expenses (contract negotiations with its workforce).

4th Estate:  Not the sharpest tools in the shed seem unable to even undertake a Google search.  Granted that sensationalism sells papers it remains that their deep dislike of the current provincial administration colors everything.  Instead of asking the hard questions such as “How does the government prioritize its public works” they come up with “How can Quebcois know that this will not happen again”, morons I tell you! 

The Engineers:  The guys (who will remain nameless – but its easy enough to use Google) who told the contractor how much concrete to remove the wall surface and how it was to be removed – these were the same guys who analyzed the state of the overpass and said that the overpass was very unstable…

The Contractor: Clearly here (according to the press & governments) the guilty party here for 25 years of neglect, and improper procedures as instructed by the Engineer and the Government’s inspector (FYI Massive sarcasm here).

Quebec is not the only place where such underinvestment problems occur, what most forget is that until 1976, Montreal was the business center of the country.  The 1967 World Expo that took place in Montreal, saw massive infrastructure investments (Metropolitan Highway, Decarie Express Way, Ville Marie Highway), where material used was at time poorly understood.  These structures are at the center of all our headaches.    

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu