Skip to main content

S&P downgrades Google following its acquisition of Motorola

First off rating agencies have lots o"splaining" to do with their rating activities.  No so many years ago, several rated all the Icelandic banks AAA -- based on the idea that they were TBTF and therefore had an implicit government guarantee.  Never mind that with a population of 230,000 Iceland's banks were dwarfing the local economy.

Then there was the rating of CDO/CLO and other bastardized complex financial structures, taking a bunch of BB rated debt instruments and magically creating AAA rated paper.

The downgrading of America was a "political" decision, in view of the intractable nature of the discussions in Washington, and the dogmatism shown by the republicans.  S&P's rating decision (America is still AA+ rated -- which is not so bad) is a true reflection of a government's spending decision and its inability to find realistic solutions to the problem.

The latest downgrade of Google that decided to acquire Motorola Mobile on Monday is sheer insanity.  First, Google has been looking at the handset business for some time -- its Android operating system is now the most popular smart phone OS, for every sale of Iphone there is two sales of Android powered phones.  The reality is that Google is more than a search company, its a data company.  Personally, I suspect that within 10 years the "telephone" aspect of most smart phone will be nearly eliminated (think skype) with data accounting for 90% of traffic and revenues.  The fact that Google is sitting on nearly $30 billion in cash (and short term instruments) tells you all you need to know on this acquisition:


  1. Google is looking at growing its data business, and handset complete the loop to the customer
  2. Google is using less than 30% of its cash at hand (should they go for an all cash offer)
  3. Culture clash is certain to occur, but then Google probably wants to keep hardware and software divisions in separate silos.
  4. Google's management has been looking for a "big project" for years.
  5. Real shame here is that Google could have bought Research in Motion for the same amount of cash (although competition issue would have been more serious)


Sure there are issues with keeping the OS development away from Google/Motorola phones will be difficult, but one of the many negative aspects of Android phones is that each manufacturer "damages the brand" with its overlay and tweaks that hamper the OS's strength.  Having a pure Google OS user will "force" other android phone makers to keep the OS as clean as possible.

BTW some disgree with my view -- a particularly well written comment here that basically takes the view that Google should have purchase Nortel's patents and not Motorola...

I really don't get the downgrading here!

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu