Skip to main content

Canadian Income/Personal Debt Index is higher in Canada than the U.S – Really

Are we comparing apple and oranges here?  First off, we are comparing Personal disposable income.  While my American cousins’ harp about the fact that health care in Canada is not free, it is free as a portion of personal disposable income in Canada.  Whereas in America the average American spends nearly 20% of his disposable income on medical costs (I wish I was exaggerating – the math don’t lie!).

So the table that is often show that Canada has now passed its over indebted cousins would seem to compare to things that are not comparable.  So taking healthcare allocated revenues out of Americans disposable income reduces that index by 12%.  Which means that Canadian are not yet the worse of the lot… although we are working hard at changing this, as the direction of debt growth is for ever up while Americans are aggressively (willingly or otherwise) deleveraging.

The above graph shows the trend, and while Canada is “really” not as bad as the U.S. TODAY, the direction of both market is somewhat (huge sarcasm here) evident.  Canadians continue to borrow at unprecedented rate while the Americans are not (in fact the problems in America are becoming very severe with the destruction of credit facilities everywhere – shadow banking is in free fall). 

Bonus:  A friend recently relocated to Phoenix (big job and big salary) found a very nice house (actually a spectacular house for a very reasonable amount of cash) sought mortgages (non-conforming) from three lenders (well recognized financial institutions), the higher was for 71% LTV – not a problem for my friend, but the terms were far from interesting.  Eventually he picked a 50% mortgage – yes he invested 50% in cash.  No wonder the U.S. housing market cannot find its footing, if the minimum cash amount now required is 1/3rd of the purchase price (probably a good idea).  This to illustrate the dilemma facing the Federal Reserve tomorrow – at the very least “operation twist” is on, but they may have to do more.  Investors have lost all confidence in the system, and have chosen to protect capital instead if seeking return. 

Bonus 2: Yesterday, China “announced” that they were supporting Europe… yet at the same time Chinese banks are cutting European bank lines (BTW I totally agree with the Chinese banks position – this has been a constant refrain in North American financial institutions – the game is up in Europe, why stick around to pick up the pieces).  One thing that bankers have learned is you may be protected by your ISDA agreement if your counterparty fails, but it's September 2011 and my employer is still dealing with the Lehman legacy, we are still waiting for some of our collateral… 


Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…