Skip to main content

Cash Crunch in China Picks Up Momentum; Chinese Economy "Teetering On the Edge"



Yesterday’s Mish Shedlock title for his blog!  Basically, the Chinese government has been putting the screws to the economy in order to slow down the, out of control, housing market before something bad becomes terrible.  There is something like 65 million empty apartments in China – constructed but with no electricity provided – basically unoccupied.

In China, as in most of Asia, people like new things; this is also true for housing – go figure!  Still it is what it is, so if you buy an apartment as an investment you want to keep it “pristine” and therefore unoccupied form, so that you get full value when you sell it.  Think of an apartment as a car, a soon as it leaves the show room it looses value.

So the Chinese government has been aware for some time that excessive investment in real estate has taken place, for two years now the Chinese government has been trying to slow the housing market, and its latest tactic is to starve the market of credit – raising capital requirements and making life hard for the informal financial market.  The impact is clear to see, as cash is flow back to china and the differential between off shore Yuan and onshore one has narrowed dramatically.   

About 75% of China’s economy is investments; infrastructure (roads & Bridge) manufacturing (steel, concrete etc) and housing (discussed above).  Now the steel industry and the concrete industry are geared to local asset expansion, bridge and roads require concrete and steel as do housing, which also requires wood, bricks and copper and other material.

NOTE: here comes the Canadian connection.

Canada like Australia is very dependent on trade for its GDP, as an example about 1/3 of Canada’s GDP relates to exports – and a great percentage of this is raw material (Oil, Iron Ore, Zinc) and commodities (Wheat, soya etc).  America our immediate neighbour, and largest trading partner, has a much lower dependence on trade (around 10% of GDP), so whenever an America politician says that trade will save the U.S., the only answer is: In what universe?  Back to Canada, China is not only Canada’s third largest trading partner (after America and the U.K.) it is concentrated in the “things that are heavy” segment.  Yes Canada has exported some mass transit products and aircraft but overall the Canada to China trade is one of raw materials. 

Canada is a second derivative country, we are not the market we are not the maker of the product, we are the provider of the inputs for the countries that make things – it may seem a lowly position, but it has served Canada well, and in fact Canada cannot compete with the Chinese (or Vietnamese) for labour costs.

But is also means that when things go bad in America (and they seem to be really bad), the U.K. (really same boat as America, maybe a little further along – but a long way to go) we have to rely on the growing demand for raw material by China to feed our economy.  Now the signs are that China is getting close to the precipice:  its two core consumers (Europe and America) are in trouble – Japan its third largest market (really an intermediary to sell to America and Europe) is facing the same pressures.  Moreover, the Chinese government is becoming concerned about its debt burden, for while the country’s borrowings are reasonable, because China is a command economy it also effectively guarantee the debt burden of local governments, and state owned enterprises.  Bottom line whereas China’s sovereign debt is low, aggregating the debts of SOE and local governments brings the number much, much higher!  The Chinese authorities in 2008 injected about $700 billion into their economy – to avoid a recession, an amount equal to what America invested, but a smaller economy and most of the funds were used for building things (the bulk of funds were transferred to state and local government to keep things going… far less stimulus).  Chinese are unlikely to have the same appetite, moreover, with the high inflation (due in large part to an undervalued Yuan – to support unprofitable exports) the Chinese authorities’ hands are tied.

That spells trouble for Canada…

Impact will be two fold, we can expect a weakness in the price of raw material (already king copper has taken a hit), other like Zinc (stainless steel) and oil are sure to follow.  The impact on the CAD is certain to be important, especially since the weak dollar policy seems to have been reversed.  My guess is that the CAD could fall to the 92/93 range depending on the depth of the Chinese slow down.  This could be a difficult ride for Canada – it may be that the BoC’s 1.9% GDP growth forecast in 2012 is optimistic, personally I think that the 2.2% growth forecast in 2011 is very optimistic, considering that the first half generated growth of only 0.7% (Q1 +1% Q2 -0.2%).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu