Skip to main content

Comparing costs of health Care

From today's Globe and Mail:



Montanans will spend almost $8-billion (U.S.) for health care this year, while Saskatchewanians will spend $4.5-billion. That is a whopping difference. But spending is just part of the story.
In Montana, more than 280,000 people under the age of 65 had no health insurance last year, according to Families USA. Another 55,000 insured residents still faced “catastrophic” out-of-pocket health expenses – meaning more than $14,000. Private health insurance does not come cheap: The average premium for a family was $13,770 a year, double what it was five years earlier, according to the Kaiser Foundation.


 The state of Montana is the same size (population) with the same ethnic mix and industry as Saskatchewan.  A population of 1 million in both places, the G&M found that the total health care expenditure for Montana was nearly twice that of Saskatchewan, but more importantly, a quarter of the population is not covered (by choice or because the cost of insurance is prohibitive -- also some people with "pre-existing conditions" cannot obtain health care coverage).

As a microcosm of the problems faced by many Americans, Montana is a good example of what is wrong.  Of course, for some people in Montana the cost of health care (or access) is not a problem, but it remains that for a quarter of Montana's population health care is a huge problem (BTW those young people who maintain they don't need "no stinking healthcare" use expensive emergency room treatment when something happens!).  

Montana is now looking at adopting the Saskatchewan model (don't know if its possible) as a way of controlling health care costs (oft forgotten is that the states cover the bulk of health care costs -- hence the states' dislike for "Obamacare" -- they foot the bill of the expanded program).  Americans often thing that the Canadian health care system is monolithic, when in fact Canada has 11 health care system (each province is different), the Federal government used to have a great deal of say on the medical system used in each province, but this has whittled away as the old 50/50 funding model has been replaced with a 85/15 model today --  money speaks here!  Saskatchewan's system is very different to that of Quebec and Ontario, so the departure is not as radical as it may first appear.  It will be interesting to see the rank of those with vested interests (HMOs and big Pharma) -- doctors increasingly work in large practices and may actually prefer the Canadian health care system!


Anyway, an interesting analysis from the Globe and Mail, and a massive problem for the GOP/Republicans!  If an American state decides to implement a "Canadian" health care system it will cause massive problems for the Washington talking machine.


Note:  Last night I learned that there are more MRI machines in Montana than in all of Canada.  It begs the question, does Canada have too few MRI or does Montana have too many?  This morning, I checked with a doctor friend, asked him how long it I would have to wait to get an knee MRI -- he told me: two weeks for elective, and if I tore something he could get me in before the weekend!!! So my guess is that Montana has too many MRI... maybe this explains why there healthcare costs are so much higher?





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…