Skip to main content

2012 and all that

The new year is now 12 days old, and 2012 feels a lot like 2011.  Few of the core issues have been addressed in any meaningful way.  Here in Canada the debate is about the possible price deflation in housing, for although Canada is one of the few OECD countries that has seen reasonable growth since 2007, there is a feeling that the party is overdue to end.

First and foremost is the now 13 year old housing boom; as a participant in this sector until recently, my feeling are that on average 7% annual price growth is not sustainable.  Although national income has risen continually over that period (bar for a brief period in 2008) it remains that Canadian house prices are driven by ultra low (and in the long term unsustainable) low interest rates.  The question is not so much on the likelihood of a correction, but rather a question of timing and size! 

Other issue of interest last week was IPPI

Prices for industrial goods increase slightly

Remove fuel from the equation (not that this is entirely justifiable) and a picture emerges of an economy that has prices under control for its production process.  On the employment side of the equation, the data last week was very weak; whereas an rise in the number of employed Canadians was expected, what we got instead was a reduction (unlike in America which saw surprisingly resilient employment numbers). 

Canada is, and will remain, a second derivative economy; its health is less driven by endogenous factors and more driven by exogenous forces to which the economy has to adapt.

For once I will refrain from making any predictions on the economy -- I was wrong on GDP growth, I was wrong on the bond market and I was wrong on the equity market (too optimistic, to pessimistic and to pessimistic).

I'm back, and I still don't know

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…