Skip to main content


Is it just me, but looking at Facebook's market valuation (around $75 billion) its revenues ($3 billion) you wonder what kind of growth is being factored in here.

From Facebooks's S-1:

We had 845 million MAUs {monthly average users} as of December 31, 2011, an increase of 39% as compared to 608 million MAUs as of December 31, 2010.
We had 483 million daily active users (DAUs) on average in December 2011, an increase of 48% as compared to 327 million DAUs in December 2010.
We had more than 425 million MAUs who used Facebook mobile products in December 2011
During the month of December 2011, we had on average 360 million users who were active with Facebook on at least six out of the last seven days, providing perspective on the number of people for whom Facebook is essentially an everyday activity

Think about these numbers for a minute in terms of total world population!  Lets say there are 7 billion humans on earth, that means that 12% have a Facebook account, and that 1/15 look/update there Facebook at least 6 days a week. Honestly, how do you grow from that base; when already 12% of the world population has a Facebook account -- It gets even worse, a good chunk of the population has no access (or very limited access) to the internet.  Lets say that 1/3rd of the world population has access (by hook or by crook) to the internet -- still 2.5 billion is a large number.  I would say that 800 million accounts of which half are daily users is a fair share of the global population.  So Facebook's model (which was always a way for people to socialise -- read hook up) will have to generate more dollar per users, in a new (and yet untapped) way.  

As one analyst point out when people go to google they are either looking for information about facts or about things and products -- in other words they are looking at solving a problem.  That's not the case on Facebook, they are there to socialise.  Frankly, I doubted Google's profit model when it first emerged, I suspect that even they could not contemplate how the world of information has changed.  Its true that for teenagers Facebook may be a great way of shopping for things, it may be true that it's a great way of finding a doctor, dentist on recommendation of people you know.  I for o ne remain wary of Tripadvisor - you never know who wrote the comments on a specific hotel or resort -- the future may be a more curated forms of information.  So Facebook may have an edge, still it remains that it is a largely unexplored area of growth for the company that has been focusing on growing its user based (at astonishing speed and volume) and not so much at growing its revenues -- although they have gone up rather dramatically.  But with net profits of $1 billion in 2011 (not bad really) a market valuation of $75 billion is a massive multiple.

One thing for sure, once 7% of the world population uses your site at least 6 days a week -- your growth model is more challenging and definitively outside your comfort zone. 

Note to readers:  Before any snide remarks are made, I do realize that tons of companies have Facebook pages, (movie too apparently).  So the comparison is not entirely appropriate, still 7% of the world population and probably 1/3 of the world's "connected" population... still a very large percentage.

Note to readers:  I have no positions in Google, Facebook, and Tripadvisor


Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…