Skip to main content

Financing the political process

Up here in Quebec there's been all kind of disclosure at a specially created commission (Commission Charboneau) on the goings on in the province as to how infrastructure projects were used to funnel money to political parties.

Hearing the outcry in the rest of the country you would thing that Quebec is the only place (like really!) where these kind of games takes place -- you can bet serious money that this is not the case.  The problem here is that the small number of contractors available (Quebec is a small place), made it easy to create a merry-go-round of briberies that were channelled to certain political parties.

So far the dirt has been at the municipal level -- projects are numerous and generally small, elected officials have few ressources, they are not that smart and the job is essentially about garbage collection and cleaning the streets -- not very exiting.   The process is likely to move to the "provincial" level soon, although the game there is more complicated, not because there are many more bidders, but because of the open competition process -- look at the mess that is the Montreal subway system...(1).  Still it "seems" that it it possible to game the system there too -- if what has been reveled is true it appears that even PPP projets saw briberies being paid.

In a fit of madness the government of Quebec decided to reduce contribution to $100 per person per year -- the maximum before hand was $3,000 -- the amusing thing here is that many people believe that a $3,000 contribution is enough to sway a government in giving multi million dollar contract -- now i'm exaggerating  there was lots of bundeling (but then both parties were beneficiary), people would rent their name, make the personal donation and then claim this as a business expense (oh the hypocrisy of it all), 

Now the law of unintended consequence comes into action; first old style fund raising is over, no more cocktails to thank party donnors, instead the internet will be used to get $10 dollar donation over button issues -- don't like the new arena in Quebec city, give $10 to your favorite politician.  The age of internet payment allows a greater separation between the voter and their representative, since your financial contribution to a politician is now insignificant .. in the same stroke website will be built (they exist in other countries) to see how your politician supported your views in the past.

This will fundamentally change the political process in the province (maybe for the better), but my guess is that you will have the equivalent of the Daily Kos or Drudge Report to create the "crisis" situation to stimulate fund raising.

That means more attack adds, mostly via the internet -- very very cheap process rather than television which is being abandoned as a source of information anyway.  Our politicians have not clued onto the internet (just check out the web site of any Canadian political parties -- it looks like a web site from 1999) full of bad video (what's wrong with Youtube guys) its not that programers are not good, its a question of budget allocation -- political parties are mostly run by old white guys (sorry Mme Marois) -- who "understand computers" but not the internet.  My prediction is that this $100 limit will create a monster!  because outrage will become the only voice of the land -- after all its the only way to separate you from your hard earned (and heavily taxed) dollars.

This aint over


(1) Several years ago, the Quebec minister of transport decided that it was legal for the province to select Bombardier to replace the aging rolling stock and systems that run Montreal subway system -- the same trains have been working hard since 1969.  Big surprise this turns out to be completely illegal, slowing the process down by years (the bids were for 2002, and the trains should have been running by 2010 -- today in 2013 they haven't even give the contract yet).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…