Skip to main content

Oil price, elasticity winners and losers!

Sunday night I began writing on the astounding drop in the oil sector, at the time (Tokyo time 9am Monday) the price of oil was on its way to $64/bbl down from $105 in January -- this is a 39% drop in price -- a singularly important component of the world economy, just became much cheaper. Since then oil prices have risen back to the $67/68 range, so crisis averted...

The retracement in the oil market is natural, a function of properly working financial market.  My guess was that at $64.55/bbl we were looking at a massive natural barrier to further drops, there's a futures market out there, and for the players there are "natural" inflection points.  Now these are usually technical (rules of thumb) issues, but it remains that they are real for the market.  What is happening is "consolidation", the market overshot and now its finding a new (maybe temporary) equilibrium.  Oil prices are not independent, they are a transfer of wealth between the user and the supplier.  Lower oil prices means that the users retain more of their wealth, and the supplier have less to spend.

The big losers:  Countries such as Saudi Arabia that have variable costs of maybe $10/bbl are still doing well, although I understand that to justify the country's "living expenses" $70/90 per barrel is really much more comfortable.  Watch this year -- Saudi Arabia's government will have a sizeable deficit.

The big winners are massive consumers:  China, most of South America, the US (they still import) and Europe.  the big losers:  Russia, Canada, Middle East -- Far East (Malaysia & Indonesia).  So there are winners and there are losers too.

Capital markets will probably not be very happy.  A substantial portion of the junk bond market has financed oil and gas project -- some of these are fine, others not so much.  The real problem is that with the hedge fund industry all bets are off, what in the past would have been a technical default with a covenant renegotiation can become a drawn-out battle for control.  Those who have a small position can easily be crushed by these big players -- logic has little to do with these instruments.

We have witnessed a major shift in the oil&gas segment.  At this stage it is unclear where all this is going; there is no doubt that at $105/bbl there was lots of money hunting new finds.  At $60/70 per bbl there will be less money hunting for new oil finds.  Already certain Canadian oil sands projects are hitting the wall -- at $55/bbl (heavy crude is discounted against the WTI) the economics are just not there anymore.  projects that are already up and running (when the heavy Capex has already occurred) continue to operate, at least as long as the variable covered.

Canada is one of the losers (well Alberta and Saskatchewan the big producers) are hurting, budgets will have to be revised, since the province (where there is no provincial income taxes) lives of the royalties from its oil and gas finds -- very little of Alberta's oil revenues have been saved for a rainy day, mainly because the size of the oil sands (a few hundred years).

So what's the big takeaway here:  First the 35% drop in oil price has transferred wealth from some parts of the world to others -- China, as a massive oil importer, just saw its production costs drop, Russia is not finding this very amusing -- although its production costs are low, but the size of the transfer just dropped.

Green energy solutions were kicked in the teeth, at $105 solar pannels are nearly competitive -- and once you take into account the fixe/variable cost analysis -- solar energy was basically on par with oil.  Now they are 40% more expensive.  This price drop is almost certain to reduce the attractiveness of all green energy projects.

The concern by economist is that everyone has been cooking the books -- just a little; the problem is not the rise in supply but the fall in demand (we now know that Europe's growth last summer was virtually inexistent) we are talking 0.1%.  Although the ECB has targeted inflation rates of 2% -- the numbers are far low (and now with a massive drop in the cost of energy) inflation numbers could go negative -- deflation could be here.

Japan is a mess, China may see some hope out of the lower oil price but as a massive exporter of goods and where its markets (Japan, Europe and the US) are either in recession, near a recession or suffering from low growth -- despite very stimulative policies it may be that its not only the supply side that is a problem, but more fundamentally the demand side of the equation...


Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…