Skip to main content

China's stock market

Having been away from the news (mainly because the internet was down) for a few days, I missed the latest and greatest about the Chinese stock market.  The news is not good, granted the panic seems to have ebbed but it remains that the past few weeks have been painful for investors (who are very leveraged).

Rumours are that there is an implicit price target of 4,500 for the Shanghai Composite index (the S&P 500 for China's main market) that today closed at around 3,600 off from its high of 5,100 (or about 35% lower -- which is bad).  The Chinese government has been working hard (and I mean really hard) at convincing the market that the market will go up, it has "encouraged" brokers to take large positions, ended the ability to IPO, it has made many stock "un-tradable" thereby reducing the volume of shares available.  In fact, the Chinese government has dubbed sellers as traitors!

If these rumours are true, and the Government can make the market calm down and start buying again there is still the 4,500 "liquidity" level -- at which the big stake holders will liquidate their unwilling participation in the market stabilisation efforts.  That, by the way, acts as a price barrier. In effect these stake holder have a put option (they can sell the shares to the market -- right now they cannot).  Now the nomenclature is not terribly important, but it means that the investors has a problem, as the prices of the market gravitates (eventually) close to 4,500 then liquidity will grow dramatically, and prices will fall.  In other words investors "know" that there is a real asymmetry of return, there is limited upside and massive downside -- that's a strategy, that as an investor you can take advantage of by using a series of puts or barrier options.  

The market is around 3,600 if you take the view that the government will do almost anything to get the price up beyond 4,200/4,400 then as an investor you have a massive opportunity -- not by shorting but by using derivatives!

My guess is that to limit the downside the best option (unintended pun) is to use some type of reverse straddle that will reduce your losses if the market plows through  4,500 but will give you massive upside if the market goes down further -- like to its 2013 level.

Honestly, I don't know who would allow you to write such an option position (especially since the Chinese market is closed to foreigners), but my guess is that it should be possible via the ETF market! At any rate this is almost a can't loose strategy (sure you've heard that before!!!), simply because the Chinese market is very "rich" the market perceives that barrier at 4,500 and so the cost of some of the protection options involved in this trade can be "cheap".

This, I think, is a sweet trade.

P.S.  I have to skin in the game here, no position either derivative or underlying stocks or ETF in the Chinese market.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…