Skip to main content

Energy loans are now causing systemic risks to US banks

"The Dallas Fed met with the banks a week ago and effectively suspended mark-to-market on energy debts and as a result no impairments are being written down. Furthermore, as we reported earlier this week, the Fed indicated 'under the table' that banks were to work with the energy companies on delivering without a markdown on worry that a backstop, or bail-in, was needed after reviewing loan losses which would exceed the current tier 1 capital tranches."
Zero Hedge, January 18,2015
That's more like it!  There is no doubt that the US bank's exposure to the drilling sector was large. Ideally, for the banks was to issue bonds (Junk, but they like to call them High Yield...) that was the feed for the US energy sector over the past 5 years.  Almost any project was fundable, because extraction costs were around $50/$60 and prices were around $80/$90.  As of 9:00 am today oil prices (WTI) are trading around $29.95, so that producers are maximising output so as to pay variable costs.  However, banks still "normally" would show loan impairment.  Covenants are breached and the prudent thing is to take loan loss provisions, that would reflect in a mark to market of the loans -- now it appears that there is, like in 2008, an agreement to "suspend" this mark to market rule, so as to not impact Tier one capital.

Now, that's a worrying development.  The implication is that banks have sufficiently large exposure to the E&P sector, which is clearly distressed, so as to have Tier one implication for the banks. Shows that the regulator took the line and the sinker, when it agreed to banks excessive exposure to that sector.  Compare this to Canada, where the Oil Sands business is far more affected, but where the banks are only discussing minor impairment in the Western portfolio.

The US is not in a recession, granted growth is not as robust as it could be, but it is still positive.  Yet the banks are forced to take action on their mark to market rules as to avoid impairment.  This indicate that the banks were, once again, imprudent in their lending activities... I saw the big short a few nights ago, nice story, but it shows that the banks have learned once lesson very well, privatize the profits and socialize the losses -- the American tax payer is a sucker, and should be exploited.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu