Skip to main content

American Elections & the Republican conundrum

I remember about a year ago, the chairman of the GOP saying that they had a deep field of candidate for the 2016 presidential election; and then Donald Trump thru his hat in the ring...We are now in April 2016, and within the next few weeks (maybe days) the presumtive nominees for the Democrats and the Republican will be finalizes.  Ms Clinton with all her faults, real, perceived or simply made up, will almost certainly head up the Democrats.  For the GOP its still a choice between Trump and Cruz, but in reality neither are acceptable to the vast majority of the electorate -- so it really doesn't matter.

What is truly interesting is the impact on November's voters; some will vote only the down ticket, but in reality voters almost never vote the bottom of the ticket.  So my best guess is that a lot of Republicans will stay home in November, will hand the Democrats a victory on par with what Reagan got in the 1980's a 30/40 state victory -- this will be a historic defeat for the GOP; if its Trump (which is looking increasingly likely) the GOP will be able to say that it was not them, it was the nominee's fault -- giving them the ability to further deny reality of their failed policy, if its Cruz, I suspect they will still say its the candidate, but they will not be able to say that he was not at the very very right end of the spectrum.

This will at the very least hand the Senate back to the Democrats -- and may do the same for the house...although the house is, with all its gerrymandering, is harder to judge.

Maybe the GOP will change its ways.  The rise of Trump is entirely due to the GOP's historical habit of bait and switch; talk about values and middle america as the core of the economy, but then pass legislation that allows the 1% to off-shore their wage bill to lower cost jurisdiction and cut the 1% taxes even further.  In short the GOP has largely taken its voters for granted (BTW the Democrats have done the same with the african american vote too...), still Trump has clearly addressed these "core Americans' concerns"  (e.g. middle age blue collar white guys).  The press loves Trump, he gets about 85% of all press coverage.  His rallies are energies (and apparently violent).  

The GOP's conundrum is as follows:  After the 2012 defeat the GOP undertook a full review of its platform and what Americans were saying -- especially Republican Americans; and instead of following the script (Jeb Bush by the way) the GOP went full loco, full right wing crazy -- build a wall etc etc etc.  Granted the GOPs problem are even deeper; their willingness to gerrymander certain congressional seats means that there is an increasingly large number of representants that will not move an inch from their dogmatic position -- because they don't need to! They are elected by a minuscule subset of the electorate (in primaries) and then always win!  The GOP has no control on the selection process -- since all these campaigns are self funded (BTW that's what gave rise to Mr. Trump)

That's the GOP conundrum, the two front runners for the nominations are both deeply flawed candidates that the GOP establishment will easily dismiss as irrelevant; making the GOP unelectable for the foreseeable future.  Now I am not a republican (for starts I am not an American), still any political system who has a broken party is pray to massive problems.  The UK faced similar situation during the Thatcher years -- the labour party was unelectable, and so the system of check and balances fell apart.


Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…