Skip to main content

The saddest news -- Brexit may well happen!

I cannot believe that I am on the same side as the big investment banks; I always though that the UK had more to gain inside of Europe than outside (Economics valuation).  Turns out the new polls are showing that a majority of Brits are for exit from Europe.  

It will be expensive economically, the pound is certain to take a hit, Britain is very reliant on foreign capital (to the tune of 7% of GDP). There is no doubt that Europe will go out of its way to make things difficult for Britain (and what about Ireland?).  Europe's bureaucrats will try to punish the Brits by killing the City' s access to Europe's businesses -- just because they can. Although I am not so sure that Germany wants that poison chalice, although I am sure that France would -- I wonder what Investment banking looks like with a 35 hours work week? (just saying...)

This morning I read Abrose Evans-Prichard, who just two weeks ago said in his weekly column that the departure of the UK would be very expensive.  However, yesterday he wrote that he would vote for the exit.  He is a hugely smart, well spoken guy.  First, he doesn't buy the Brexit proponents that an exit of Europe would be a no cost outcome, maybe even a gain for the UK.  He believes that the short term cost of the exit will be very high indeed.

However, AEP is more worried about democratic institutions.  There is no doubt that the ECB's secret letters to Italy and Greece, its actions in Cyprus and elsewhere are deeply undemocratic.  In fact, a referendum that SPECIFICALLY rejected the Mastrich agreement was just disregarded.  The ECB is the executant of Angela Merkel's political decisions that all that is right in Europe is the making of Germany and that everyone else is at fault.

AEP writes: "We are deciding whether to be guided by a Commission with quasi-executive powers that operates more like the priesthood of the 13th Century papacy than a modern civil service; and whether to submit to a European Court of Justice (ECJ) that claims sweeping supremacy, with no right of appeal."

Fighting words in deed.  In a sense his reasons for leaving are the same than those who though the Munich Agreement (appeasing Hitler) was a disaster and treason was that it was going the easy way "Peace in our time" was a way to avoid the unpleasant truth that something was not right (BTW I am not linking Europe to Hitler -- rather sometime unpleasant actions have to be taken based on principles with disregard to the economic consequences).



Read AEP's article here .  A unfortunately worthy argument! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…