Skip to main content

Monday July 25th -- Summer doldrums & squaring the market with politics

The markets are set to open, and we can expect a flat day!  That was true 20 years ago, when the market was traded by people -- and people go on holidays.  Today, the vast majority of trading is done by machines, and machines don't take holidays (well they do take a break when they update the algos).

Big news this weekend, Trump got a bump!  He is now ahead of Clinton in the national polls -- how such a man achieves this is beyond understanding.  Did America hear his toxic message full of falsehood?  I suspect not, I suspect they don't really care because unlike the market politics goes to sleep during the summer months.  Starting today is the Democrats' turn to do their dog and pony show.  The press is agog as to whether it will be a clusterfuck as the GOP's sad affaire was last week, or if it will be borring as hell.  My guess is borring.  The Bernie supporters will vent their spleen for a day (maybe less) and will unit behind Clinton.

Several years ago, I met with a childhood friend who was a proud supporter of Ralph Nader.  I kindly suggested that its guys like him that handed the election to G.W. Bush, instead of the Democrats.  He didn't agree (although the maths supported my assertion) he sincerely believed that his vote of protest was important and that he made a difference in the election -- I said I totally agreed, you made sure that Bush would be elected!  Needless to say that we have not spoken much since.  It is a sickness of the left, to support lost causes, and its entirely possible that like my childhood friend several on the left will feel betrayed because their guy lost, and will therefore not vote, since the only vote that counts is the one for your candidate.  Granted I am hoping that many Republican will do the same in November -- because if you cannot stand your party's candidate, why bother to vote at all!

While I was writing these first few sentences the market opened and its down a bit, but then its kind of a given.  The algos will play with the market and see if they can create a market direction (up or down is of little importance),   The truth is that after last week the markets wants down -- its been an amazing month for the market -- the S&P500 is up more than 8% in 30 days -- that's powerful upswing; which makes Trump's statement of last week a bit difficult to square with the market enthusiasm... anyway, we are at the end of July, most big pension funds are on holidays -- the bosses are anyway, and there are few instruction that boil down to:  Don't fuck-up our positions.  That means that the real money (aka investors) is being ultra conservative.  Only big signals will trigger movements.  Which is a pain for the algo crowd that needs volatility.

It is entirely possible that Clinton will provide that excitement.  After all several thousands in the GOP want her jailed (for some imaginary crime) or even better hung or shot by a firing squad.

In the mean time, a 8% bump in the S&P500 is a signal to consolidate...on the other hand YoY its only a 4% rise in the market (granted a new all time high), so do as you wish, 'cause I got nothing!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…