Skip to main content

Canada's housing market

finally, the authorities have taken step to slow the Vancouver housing market.  The tool used was rather blunt, and somewhat late to the game, still housing prices in Vancouver seem to finally be slowing down, some estimates show that housing prices in metro Vancouver are down 20%.  Now like everything this must be taken with a grain of salt, one month doesn't a year make, still the introduction of a 15% tax on real estate transactions is important.

It isn't very efficient insofar as it it a tax on transaction, but it can be reduced or removed quickly should the price action be sustained.  Now, economically, this type of tax makes sense, it was introduces successfully in the UK about 18 months ago, and did cool the market there to a degree.  Vancouver has different issues that make the tax more or less useful.  There is little speculation driver in Vancouver, the price action is based on real demand from foreign investors, but there too the real drivers are hard to understand.  For more than a year the Chinese government has been working to reduce capital flight -- this has been mostly apparent in Macao, a gambling den, just a short boat ride away from China, that has seen massive reduction in gambling revenues!

Still this is not to diminish the importance of the tax, by introducing inefficiencies the government insures a slow down in demand, and the implosion in prices is probably worse then expect,ed as sales in metro Vancouver two months ago went from 800 to less than 70... A sign that something has changed.

In a similar trend is the desire of the green movement to impede traffic in cities to encourage public transport, I never understood their reluctance to use market tools.  For me Singapore and London are beckons of sanity, by introducing road pricing they have allowed the market to clear based on need, granted poorer resident face an uphill struggle, but let's be honest, they would anyway.  The reality is that road pricing works and does in fact produce real revenue streams that allow the improvement of public transit, yet most "green" transport crusaders would rather have people stuck in traffic, creating portion and imposing a real economic burden, that benefits no one, and actually creates a real net loss to the economy (pollution & time wasted).




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…