Skip to main content

Will Trump start a trade war?

President Trump has been in office for 48 hours now and so far we have seen the following:

  1. Plans massive tariffs on imports (especially if the White House "believes" that the jobs were stolen")
  2. Reduce regulation by 75%
  3. Shut down PBS -- that was Saturday and I've not seen anything more about that since

Aside from the weekend fight over the number of attendants at the inauguration, and I mean the entire weekend. When it was obvious from photograph that the thing was poorly attended.  The reality is that a large number of people would go to Washington for the "show" and Trump didn't deliver (there were no A or B list stars at his show ) so what's the point!

Once the images were out there was little doubt that it was fewer than Obama in '08.  So fine, let it be! BUT if this is all it takes to take Team Trump off its message (of a new administration) they will get bogged down quickly.  The idea that massive tariffs will be a huge win for Americans is hard to swallow -- after all its American who will pay more for their iPhones and tablets.

The shutting down of PBS (which cost US$ 445 million per annum), seems to be aiming for the wrong objective when you say you want to cut the massive government expenses of 3.8 trillion -- $445 million is equal to 0.002% of the federal government's annual expenses about the same as Planned Parenthood -- these cuts are about perception and not reality.

If the US government imposes huge tariffs on imports (which it is free to do) it will also have to leave the World Trade organization -- as that institution has set limits to punitive damages.  It is hard to say if that is Team Trump's objective, but since he's made no bones about leaving NATO (to Putin's joy) that too can be a goner.

The question is what is the impact of a trade war with China, Mexico and Canada?  That's the real key here.  Two facts are certain, inflation will increase in the US as prices rise to accommodate these rising costs.  The long term is harder to figure out.

There's a lot of goodwill that about to leave the negotiations.  If I were Canada I would look to other markets to buy goods.  In effect, Canada and Mexico have close their borders to other nations favoring the US (and each other) it would be easy for these situations to change -- Air conditioners from China or Korea could be given favorable treatment (or at least remove duties), other duties that have protected north American manufacturers could also be reconsidered.

Attacking the US policy directly will never work, instead stealth is called for instead.  It doesn't penalize your customers (and voters) while impacting manufacturers of the country seeking to impose duties -- by making other goods cheaper, and hence more attractive


Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…