Skip to main content

NAFTA: Its been 23 years; time for a divorce?

NOTE:  In the hours following this announcement, Trump announced that he's changed his mind -- for now.  If I were Canada and Mexico, I would start investigating the availability of Wheat & other grains from Brazil..

Well it looks like Trump is getting ready to kill NAFTA. Since he's probably not aware of the full ramifications of the agreement it will come and bite him in the ass, but for now he sounds tough. He's even claimed that its at the urging of Mexico and Canada that he's about to "try" to kill NAFTA.

Should NAFTA survive?  The short answer is yes it has been good for all three trading partners, in fact it has been very very good for the US.  However, and as usual, its the squeaky wheel that gets the notice.  For most US companies (and consumers) trade with Mexico or Canada has been good, but not for dairy farmers who feel that Canada is an unexplored opportunity -- they are right, but the introduction of of more American milk will kill Canada's dairy industry -- the costs of production are much lower in the the US.

So despite the fact that Canada runs a US$ 400 million dairy deficit with the US, America's President believes that American farmers have been treated unfairly.  Killing NAFTA will have the strange impact for American dairy farmers of completely cutting off US milk from Canadian markets.  Two other examples of unforced errors:  (a) Mexican grain buyers are buying from further afield for new supplies; the US had a $ 1.6 billion grain surplus with Mexico, and (b) Fruit & vegetable farmers are seeing their "cheap labor" disappear, courtesy of ICE (America's immigration police).

The list of "winners" in America is long, but they've got what they want so they don't need to voice their opinion.  American pork farmers have very healthy sales to Mexico (maybe now Mexicans will consider Canadian pork instead?).

Now, can Trump kill NAFTA -- probably not directly, but he certainly can disrupt trade with his two principal trade partners?  There is a school of though that believes that because NAFTA was approved via a new law adopted by Congress, it is the only body that can terminate the agreement. However, there is a very simple process for Trump, like Theresa May in England, he can invoke the termination clause, and within 6 months America will be able to withdraw from the agreement.

Again Congress can stand in the way of Trump, Iowa farmers are already voicing their displeasure at the disappearance of Mexican grain buyers, but will this be enough?  It is hard to say.  There is a huge wave of protectionism gripping America -- the media (especially FOX) has been playing boogyman to all the worse fears of American blue collar workers.   That its those pesky foreigners that are taking all their jobs.  Killing NAFTA will have a similar impact than Britain's exit from Europe.  The economics costs of such decision are hard to quantify, but a certainly substantial.

This morning, Trump indicated that being President was very hard, and much harder than he anticipated.  Imagine how he will react when a real crisis occurs -- and not one created by his twitter account!


Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…