Skip to main content

This is what China’s commentator believe about the G7 countries

A year and half after the first shock waves of the global financial tsunami, Western economies - including the US and the European Union (EU) but excluding Australia and Canada, which are big natural resources exporters - are marching toward economic failure. I base this assertion on just one thing: Their governments are afraid to do the right thing.

With the full knowledge of what their fatal policies will lead to, their politicians do not seem to have the political courage to rally the support of the people to accept the necessary pain and make the sacrifices as preached by the Washington Consensus. Instead, Western governments have taken the other direction.

Much attention has been focused on the stagflation effect of spawning banknotes from helicopters, a metaphor for monetary quantitative easing.

That was bad already. Worse, the money has been given to a bunch of rich crooks who created the present quagmire in the first place. This is more than robbing the poor to pay the rich.

It is a typical case of grave moral hazard, especially in the US, where those who follow the rules are being punished for the benefit of those who destroy them. The world is now turned upside down, and it clearly spells trouble.

This is bad, not that China is itself blame free of this bubble mentality, but still…The one nice”er” aspect to this commentary is that Canada and Australia are outside the mix.

On other issues it seems that Bay Street is more divided on the ability/desire of the BoC to raise rates in July (at its next meeting).  The statement that announced the rate increase also included a bit about the global economy, and its impact on Canada.

I mentioned before that the health of the Canadian economy is a first derivative exposure to global GDP growth.  Its not so much that the world buys what Canadian companies make, rather we provide many of the building blocks (or as Dennis Gartman mentioned – things that are heavy and hurt your foot when you drop them) of international trade.  Should demand in Europe and America decelerate, then Chinese and Taiwanese manufacturers would need less of the raw materials that Canada (and Australia) producer.  Already raw material prices are dropping, with the copper king leading the way.  

 


Rumors are that China’s appetite for copper has dropped dramatically over the past few weeks – too early to say if this is a trend, but it would appear that early signals are for a Europe/America slow down that will eventually impact raw material prices – this is bound to affect Canada’s growth, and Mr. Carney’s ability to increase interest rates.

Not entirely sure what the impact on the CAD will be, right now our currency is behaving as a Petrocurrency, with a very high correlation with petrol prices... on one side a recession will lead to a reduction in consumption, on the other side US domestic supplies are constrained after the BP disaster.  Nuclear power has been sidelined in the US since the Three mile Island disaster of 1976.  Considering the importance of deep sea drilling on US production, the overall impact on oil prices is difficult to ascertain.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu