OK first, I have no skin in the game, but what is remarkable is that I had completely understated the amount invested in the AI sector. To give you a sense of how large the investment in the sector is, the Bank of England in a recent study indicated that for AI investment to meet the current stated rate of return, the entire sector would need to generate nearly $2.5 trillion in revenues per annum. To give you a sense of perspective, it's equal to 140% of the total revenues from the global tech sector. BTW, that's a lot of money! Today, right now, (and from the same study) corporate executives use AI for about 100 minutes per week, they pay small amounts and have generally indicated that they have not seen any real value to the product. Still they pay the minimum (a few hundred dollars a year). The second group are small businesses that have been able to scale up their operation using AI instead of human staff. Again, not nothing, but not a...
There were two American icebreakers, the Polar Star and the Healey. The first one has been in drydock for over three years, but the work has now stopped, it has now been determined that the 50 year old hull is simply not up to the challenge. The Healey was supposed to be the answer, in 2024 it suffered from a massive fire, and limped back to port. In its recent sea trials it had a massive engine room fire. It is not clear at this stage if the vessel can be rehabilitated. In short, the US navy needs new icebreakers. So far so simple, one tiny fly in the ointment, there are no US shipyards that are currently able to build a new military vessel (the shipyards that could, are booked until at least 2031). The solution is to purchase new hulls from other nations. The problem: the two shipyards that have the ability and capacity to build such vessels are in Canada and Finland. Not exactly good friends right now. The first is obv...