Skip to main content

Why being a contiental power is a problem for China martime ambitions

There are two types of nations, Continental and Maritime.   China is a continental power, its strength is its army.  The three most obvious naval nations are Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States.   All three live behind "sea moats".   The old India (which included Pakistan and Bangladesh was similar, although they are now a continental power but they were surrounded by moats (in the case of India the Himalayan mountain range).  Of course, the reason Pakistan and Bangladesh were created was to remove the parts that were not inside the nation, creating one of the world's most volatile borders.   

Continental and Maritime nations are fundamentally different, the first is an empire, outsiders are brought in, often against their will, to provide a buffer from invading armies.   It worked for the Han Chinese and the ethnic Russians for centuries -- the current problems in Russia are not new, and the same is true for China.  In its 3,000 years of recorded history, about 2,800 were marked by civil wars and internal conflicts.

When a nation is faced with this type of existential threat, it creates the army that it needs (a) those inside it's borders remain, and (b) those outside remain weak and disorganized.   There are plenty of examples of this throughout Europe, but Russia is easily the largest empire -- run for the benefit of the ethnic Russians, and no one else.  It remains today, that 90% of conscripts in the Russian army are from minorities and not from ethnic Russians.  

The maritime nations have different goals their nation is protected from invasion.  You have to go back to 1066 for the last successful invasion of Britain by foreigners (the Norman conquest).   The Americans fully colonized through war and acquisition their entire country only 170 years ago, the last act was the purchase of Texas in 1845, only 170 years ago, and almost 75 years after the Declaration of Independence.  A maritime nation will focus on its Navy and its overall goal will be to enhance commerce because commerce provides a maritime nation with the resources to maintain its naval assets.   A continental nation will seek to control through conquest and the destruction of its neighbours.  One looks at economic growth and the consequence of its action, the other, economics doesn't enter into the equation.

What this means for China, as a continental power, is that its focus will always be on land.   Despite Taiwan being 100 km away, it is still seen as part of the Chinese empire, it is populated by ethnic Hans and as such they are cousins.   For decades the Chinese have made it a goal to conquer Taiwan.  China's most significant problem is that its navy is small and weak, it has lots of boats, but they are small and have limited range.  China cannot project force over the oceans, because all its resources are focused on its land army, largely an army of occupation and today of incredibly intrusive surveillance state.   

Realistically, China should remain focused on its continental strength.  Its army is generally recognized as poorly trained and is mostly focused on watching the empire's citizenry.   China can easily win the battle for Taiwan by total destruction of its population and infrastructure, but then lose the war against the rest of the world.  Would anyone think of treating China differently than they have treated Russia?  Contrary to Russia (a massive exporter of raw materials including energy, food, and fertilizer) China imports most of these goods.   

Many seem to have no understanding of geography will say that America cannot blockade the South China Sea, and that China has sufficient naval power to seriously degrade America's strength.  Those same people forget about Andaman Island (off the coast of Thailand).  A blockade of Chinese-bound vessels could be easier there.  Thousands of miles from the Chinese borders, where no Chinese military vessels can protect them.  

That's the weakness of Continental powers.   Those who are open to trade, Russia, Germany, China and most of Europe's nations face that same dilemma.  Few took serious action to secure their positions, the Pols and the French the obvious exceptions.   

What does it mean for China as a continental nation, conventional war will be lost, but battles will be won, but the end game is a certainty.   Moreover, continental nations do not really care about economic growth, rather it is control of their buffer zone and of their citizenry.   By default, the maritime nations win because in the information age, those who can, leave as soon as the pendulum of oppression swings towards suppressing internal dissent.  

Over the past 10 years, Putin's various wars of aggression and his domestic suppression of economic activity have pushed nearly a million to emigrate.   No one knows how many Chinese have left the country because China doesn't track (mostly) those who emigrate.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu