Skip to main content

Why being a contiental power is a problem for China martime ambitions

There are two types of nations, Continental and Maritime.   China is a continental power, its strength is its army.  The three most obvious naval nations are Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States.   All three live behind "sea moats".   The old India (which included Pakistan and Bangladesh was similar, although they are now a continental power but they were surrounded by moats (in the case of India the Himalayan mountain range).  Of course, the reason Pakistan and Bangladesh were created was to remove the parts that were not inside the nation, creating one of the world's most volatile borders.   

Continental and Maritime nations are fundamentally different, the first is an empire, outsiders are brought in, often against their will, to provide a buffer from invading armies.   It worked for the Han Chinese and the ethnic Russians for centuries -- the current problems in Russia are not new, and the same is true for China.  In its 3,000 years of recorded history, about 2,800 were marked by civil wars and internal conflicts.

When a nation is faced with this type of existential threat, it creates the army that it needs (a) those inside it's borders remain, and (b) those outside remain weak and disorganized.   There are plenty of examples of this throughout Europe, but Russia is easily the largest empire -- run for the benefit of the ethnic Russians, and no one else.  It remains today, that 90% of conscripts in the Russian army are from minorities and not from ethnic Russians.  

The maritime nations have different goals their nation is protected from invasion.  You have to go back to 1066 for the last successful invasion of Britain by foreigners (the Norman conquest).   The Americans fully colonized through war and acquisition their entire country only 170 years ago, the last act was the purchase of Texas in 1845, only 170 years ago, and almost 75 years after the Declaration of Independence.  A maritime nation will focus on its Navy and its overall goal will be to enhance commerce because commerce provides a maritime nation with the resources to maintain its naval assets.   A continental nation will seek to control through conquest and the destruction of its neighbours.  One looks at economic growth and the consequence of its action, the other, economics doesn't enter into the equation.

What this means for China, as a continental power, is that its focus will always be on land.   Despite Taiwan being 100 km away, it is still seen as part of the Chinese empire, it is populated by ethnic Hans and as such they are cousins.   For decades the Chinese have made it a goal to conquer Taiwan.  China's most significant problem is that its navy is small and weak, it has lots of boats, but they are small and have limited range.  China cannot project force over the oceans, because all its resources are focused on its land army, largely an army of occupation and today of incredibly intrusive surveillance state.   

Realistically, China should remain focused on its continental strength.  Its army is generally recognized as poorly trained and is mostly focused on watching the empire's citizenry.   China can easily win the battle for Taiwan by total destruction of its population and infrastructure, but then lose the war against the rest of the world.  Would anyone think of treating China differently than they have treated Russia?  Contrary to Russia (a massive exporter of raw materials including energy, food, and fertilizer) China imports most of these goods.   

Many seem to have no understanding of geography will say that America cannot blockade the South China Sea, and that China has sufficient naval power to seriously degrade America's strength.  Those same people forget about Andaman Island (off the coast of Thailand).  A blockade of Chinese-bound vessels could be easier there.  Thousands of miles from the Chinese borders, where no Chinese military vessels can protect them.  

That's the weakness of Continental powers.   Those who are open to trade, Russia, Germany, China and most of Europe's nations face that same dilemma.  Few took serious action to secure their positions, the Pols and the French the obvious exceptions.   

What does it mean for China as a continental nation, conventional war will be lost, but battles will be won, but the end game is a certainty.   Moreover, continental nations do not really care about economic growth, rather it is control of their buffer zone and of their citizenry.   By default, the maritime nations win because in the information age, those who can, leave as soon as the pendulum of oppression swings towards suppressing internal dissent.  

Over the past 10 years, Putin's various wars of aggression and his domestic suppression of economic activity have pushed nearly a million to emigrate.   No one knows how many Chinese have left the country because China doesn't track (mostly) those who emigrate.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...