Skip to main content

FISA and Iran

Two unrelated issues; the first is the passage (every two years) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.  Trump is against this law and said so clearly and eloquently on numerous occasions.   It is a fundamental tool of the US foreign spying operations, and Trump wanted it revoked.   Trump did not get his way, and in a non-partisan vote, the law passed by the House of Representatives and is on its way to the Senate, there is little doubt that the law will be approved there too.   A real blow to Trump, who had actively and strongly argued against the law.

The second is that this morning, Iran seized an Israeli-related ship in the Gulf of Hormuz.   This is the first direct confrontation between Israel and Iran in a few years, both nations have hated each other for nearly 70 years which presents Israel with an incredible opportunity to change the narrative.   Iran is actively attacking Israel, effectively declaring war (not exactly but close).  The current narrative is that Israel is the only bad guy in the region, why Egypt is getting a free pass in Gaza is unclear, but the 14 km border is still heavily fortified and closed by the Egyptian army.    

The attack against Israel's interests is an escalation, the Americans will try to stay away, but it may be difficult, especially after Biden's recent visit.  Still, America sees no value added to being dragged into this war, they will probably support Israel with military aid, but will certainly not join the fight if they can avoid it. Iran has been looking for a fight, and it dreads the idea of an alliance between Saudi Arabia and Israel.  For some unclear reason, Iran has decided that a preemptive strike against Israel is a good idea, probably because Saudi Arabia had finally decided to side with Israel.  

Just two bits of interesting news   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more