Skip to main content

The Re-insurance market & US costal cities

Apparently, residents of New Orleans are starting to have difficulty finding insurance for their homes.  What had until about two years ago been limited to California (forest fires) and Florida (Hurricanes) is now spreading to Louisiana.

A friend at Lloyds told me recently what is happening.  The first to face real problems was California and its decision 15 years ago to no longer clear-cut near powerlines.  This, with the high heat and extreme drought, has caused billions in damages.  It took a while for the full impact of the shift away from clear-cutting to impact the insurance market, but it has been three years now since claims exceeded premiums.  Therefore, the syndicate's appetite for California has been very limited.

Maybe American politicians want to downplay the importance of global warming, but it's the bread and butter of the insurance industry.  Their objective is to assess their financial risks.  The truth is that Florida has been a terrible risk for a long time, and primary insurers absorbed the cost of the higher re-insurance premium for a while until it all became too much, and they quit the state.  In the US if you are an insurance company you either provide complete coverage of nothing (life insurance products are different).  So, for several years their other businesses covered the shortfall.  As of the end of 2022, all national insurance companies had left the state.

The impact on housing has been brutal, for while some can go naked without insurance, the US housing market is driven by debt, and thereby mortgages and lenders require that insurance be in place.  It will not get better...

In New Orleans, the phenomenon is the same but has been slower.  The state (unlike Florida) does provide hurricane coverage, but it's expensive.  About 3x or 4x more expensive than the national brands because it has concentration risks -- 100% of its insured coverage is for the area around New Orleans.  It's not so much an insurance but a superfund...

The high concentration of risk, flooding or hurricane winds on the coast, have a 100% probability of happening.  Therefore the "fund" has to be sufficient to meet that potential obligation.   

Note:  look no one in the re-insurance market cares about your politics or your point of view. The only determinant is maximizing the delta between payouts and premiums.   Re-insurer syndicates will use ALL the tools at their disposal.   The convergence of weather, erosion, and litigiousness makes Florida a horrible market.   Re-insurers were surprised by the impact of not clearing powerlines of vegetation, high heat, dry weather resulted in massive bushfires.   Again, their only objective is to mitigate losses, and weather analysis is taken into account.   No one cares about your politics, no one! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process
Post a Comment
Read more

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki
Post a Comment
Read more

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu
Post a Comment
Read more