Skip to main content

When Politics gets in the way of investors' best interest

Several years ago Visa (the credit card people) did an Initial Public Offering (IPO) the banks were selling off a majority of their interest in the credit card company.  Investors across the globe participated in this IPO, this joyous example of capitalism, everywhere but in the Province of Quebec.


You see Quebec has some strange rules, first is the fact that virtually all form of "giveaway contests" are illegal here.  The province of Quebec has a monopoly on gambling and makes it very expensive for companies to do these contest.  The Quebec government also insist that all prospectus be fully translated into French.


Most people don't realize but French language prospectus do not use capitalized language.  You guess the result they become thick bricks that absolutely nobody reads.  Most people don't read prospectus anyway -- they are made to be incomprehensible, but in French its even worse because you have to "guess" as to the defined terms (bankers speak).  


In virtually all other countries, the full prospectus is only available in English with a brief summary -- which by the way tends to be a lot clearer as to the intent of the investment 5Ws.     The reality is that a confluence of politics and lobbying has insured that Quebec based investors will never be able to invest in most of the world's IPO -- although they can buy in the secondary market where no French documents are available...  You see Quebec had the option 4 years ago to switch from "legalese" to plain language prospectus (as is found in Australia by the way).  Instead of 200 page onion sheet boring run-on sentences that work hard at saying nothing, plain language prospectus are short and to the point.  they give investors a clear reason for the transaction what the money is going to be used for, what the company is doing and how well its doing.


Politically the shift in Quebec is impossible, the funny side is that most Quebecers are too poor anyway to participate in IPO, and the rich folks and investment funds set up Ontario based subsidiary that can purchase the IPO.  Once again the poor get screwed for political expediency.  BTW, and this is the funny part, Quebecers don't get it... 


And of course the latest example of Quebec exclusion:


For Immediate Release toCanada News Wire and U.S. Disclosure CircuitTSX SYMBOLS: GTU.UN (Cdn. $) and GTU.U (U.S. $)
NYSE AMEX EQUITIES SYMBOL: GTU (U.S. $)

CENTRAL GOLDTRUST ANNOUNCES PROPOSED OFFERING

TORONTO, Ontario (June 15, 2010) - Central GoldTrust of Ancaster, Ontario announced today that it plans to offer Units of Central GoldTrust to the public in Canada (except Québec) and in the United States under its existing U.S.$800,000,000 base shelf prospectusdated June 8, 2009 and filed with the securities commissions in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, except Québec, and under the multijurisdictional disclosuresystem in the United States pursuant to a proposed underwritten offering by CIBC.

Central GoldTrust will only proceed with the offering if it is non-dilutive to the net asset value of the Units owned by the existing Unitholders of Central GoldTrust.

The entire original amount of U.S.$800,000,000 provided for in the base shelf prospectus is available for this offering.

Substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering will be used for gold bullion purchases, in keeping with the asset allocation provisions outlined in Central GoldTrust’s Declaration of Trust and the related policies established by its Board of Trustees. Any additional capital raised by the offering is expected to assist in reducing the annual expense ratio in favour of all Unit holders of Central GoldTrust...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu