Skip to main content

All is well in the world!

At least that's what I heard at a recent (thursday) investor conference -- I was shocked to hear that Europe was in year 6 of a 10 year de-leveraging cycle, there is no evidence of any deleveraging in Europe.  Of course house prices have crashed in certain countries, but this is not deleveraging insofar as the debt has not be repaid, it is a net loss for the economies (Spain, Greece), as these home stand empty today.

I was surprised how sanguine there were about the US (but not Canada), how things in the US were looking up, house price finally "rising" (they have in fact risen by nearly 9% since September).  However, interest rates are still very very low (lower than inflation), median income (not average) is not rising, speaking volume about the lack of purchasing power by the middle class.  

The view of Europe was that things are getting better -- they are particularly turned on by the UK -- which is strange considering the difficulties of the the Cameron government.  I suspect that there is general exhaustion about the bad news coming out of Europe.  The European central bank has decreed that it will do whatever it needs to maintain Greece's position within the union, but one has to wonder how long this will last?  Also as a "fly in the ointment"  problem is Cyprus, which is closely tied to Greece, and which has seen all three of its domestic bank forced into restructuring -- since so much of their assets were tied to Greece -- needing a rescue, Cyprus could fall out of the EU by sheer neglect giving an exit road map to other troubled economies.  

It seems that the investment community has taken the election of Obama into its stride, and are now looking at the US as an engine of growth -- for what its worth this morning's durable (December 2012 timeframe) goods number were twice as high as expected (4.6% Vs target of 2.1%), now I've not looked at the data granularity in any meaningful way, aside from Investments -- companies adding assets to their production capacity that was up marginally, but follows very strong performance in October and November its hard to draw meaningful conclusion.

Overall, their view as to the energy and ressource sectors are negative (e.g. Canada), and would see fall in prices.  China's economic growth would be lower -- at 8% but driven by consumption (not sure how that's going to happen since the incentive in China are still towards investments).  First step would be to make borrowing more expensive, paying investors meaningful interest on their deposit balances.  The other issue (to unlock value) are Chinese IPOs that are blocked because the companies cannot demonstrate profitability -- in a country were the books are unusually well cooked!  Tells you something about the strength and weaknesses of the Chinese economy.

Overall, the conference was interesting because I disagree fundamentally with their views of the world. The kicker is that these fund managers have outperformed the market almost every year (and by nearly 2% point over the life of their fund -- 25 years).  So although I disagree with their views of the world, they are probably better at reading the investment world than I am -- food for thought!

Finally, in a poll of the 150 participant (via electronic gismo) the overall risk was a black swan event!


Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…