Skip to main content

I'm back

After 9 months of quiet I've decided to post again.  My focus remains Canadian, but of course now I can be less cautious about my identity, since I no longer work in a big-ish bank... the reason for posting was to provide my non-canadian clients some insight into "all things Canadian"  leaving banking, thank god that's over, means that my natural audience had disappeared -- I still have some thoughts that I want to share.

Right now I've got a few bees in my bonnet:

(1) Why are CEO & senior management of large companies receiving compensation out of proportion with their value added [short answer is that they can!].

(2)  Why are companies borrowing so that they can pay large dividends [this is illegal in the UK where I received most of my training]

(3)  Why are union so inefficient in protecting "real rights"  [I'm thinking of you Air Canada]

I will address these issues in upcoming blogs, I need to make sure that I have more than just anecdotal evidence...

I will resist talking about "American stuff" mainly because every time you make a comment about the good old US of A, the comments section gets out of control -- and I don't really care about the US (aside from a purely neighbourly voyeuristic way). Obviously I would prefer that Canada be less  dependent on the US, NAFTA has increased the overall trade between the two economies, and has increased the risk of interference.  On the bright side the US should continue to treat Canada like Saudi Arabia, we can do more or less what we want as long as we continue to ship the "black gold" they need.  The whole "American energy independence" discourse sounds fake to me, especially when looking at data that shows that shale sector durability to be a lot less than meets the eye.

I remain fascinated by the North American energy sector, especially the shale oil and gas sector that seems to be perpetrating a fraud, the number of drilling continues to increase but the quantity of oil being produced is levelling off, which means that older shall gas/oil wells are not producing nearly as well as had been anticipated by the market.  Some energy commentators have even suggested that shale drilling is really unable to meet its capital costs... the implication is that there is not enough oil to justify the expenses of drilling.





This is a small thing -- and this graph relates specifically to the Bakken region see here the original blog post.  I'm no engineer, but one thing I know is that once you start injecting water or other substances in oil wells production is about to fall of the cliff face; and that's the starting argument for shale gas/oil... anyway (NB  I know that the poster of the original statement is making the argument that the average is not falling off, the problem is the growth of exploration which is logarithmic -- you cannot drawn average from log progression -- that's a mistake)

I'm back

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more