Skip to main content

Canada's 2010 Economic outlook

Where is Canada’s economy going in 2010 and 2011, this is not only idle curiosity on my part but also part of my day job. At heart I am agnostic, I believe raw data, but I’m not married to any one indicator, because it is easy for indicators to morph from leading to following, usually when an indicator becomes a policy tool…

My favorite data point is credit creation

(12% per annum – at no time has credit creation in Canada become negative), and number of hours worked (growing in Canada after a dip in 2009), in a deep recession I disregard unemployment numbers as too much can be hidden to make the information useful as a barometer of economic activity (especially since a large percentage of new jobs are created in small and medium size companies – not the large caps). Personal experience/history is also important (history doesn’t repeat itself, but it usually rhymes).

My take: OECD economies are facing two or maybe three contraction drivers: deleveraging by consumers (not by choice), aging baby boomers moving from capital appreciation to capital preservation in their investment strategies, and government deficit as far as the eye can see. Canada is one of two exceptions (the other being Australia). Although Canada’s government debt has risen dramatically during the current recession, 2/3 of the additional debt was backed by marketable assets (Quantitative Easing), which will be sold once the crisis has abated. In fact, the appetite by investors for high quality bond products is almost certain to make this process seamless. In Canada, for every dollar being invested into the stock market, nine are being invested in bond and synthetic bond products.

At a macro level and despite the economic conditions that prevail in the rest of developed economies, Canada has a number of attractive features: low wage inequality, a relatively homogenous population, fair education system and a low cost single payer health care system. As a net energy exporter (Oil, gas, electricity, uranium) and rich in many natural resources: Iron, zinc, copper, wood etc. Canada’s governmental debt is lower than all other OECD countries, around 76% of GDP, against 85% for USA, 80% for Germany, 100% for italy.

Problem arise when you assume that everything else is equal, already Canada’s manufacturing base is being affected by our strong currency – the Canadian dollar is trading about 10% higher than it should, and parity with the US dollar within the next few months is almost a certainty. Consumption accounts for about 50% of Canada’s GDP, exports another 20% and the balance 30% is manufacturing. This segment of the economy could be badly affected.

Our economy is closely tied to that of our southern neighbors. Earlier this week the Bank of Canada’s Monetary Policy Report hedged its bets when it came to the view on the global economic outlook:

“It is possible that the recovery in global demand could be more vigorous than projected, resulting in stronger external demand for Canadian exports.”

Another important downside risk is that the global recovery could be even more protracted than projected.”

In a nutshell the Bank of Canada is has no firm idea what will happen to the global economy over the near term.

So my predictions:

(1) Nominal GDP growth of less than 3% for 2010 & 2011 – which results in a lot of excess capacity. Most of the “pain” in the economy has been felt by the manufacturing sector, a shrinking part of Canada’s GDP (down from 33% in 1990 to 27% today)

(2) Muted inflation, if natural resources prices rise, the Canadian dollar will also rise, creating a natural inflation hedge

(3) Interest rates remain accommodative for the next 12 months, until the early part of 2011. Historically, the BoC has raised interest rates only after the Feds.

(4) Unemployment remaining high, but slowly falling back from the 8.4% to 8% over the course of the year.

Finally, I hope that I am wrong and that the economy grows more quickly, but the impediments are substantial for such an open economy. Our destiny is out of our hands.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...