Skip to main content

The Baltic Dry Index

The Baltic Dry index is an interesting index, because it shows in real time the demand and supply for non-containerized goods transport. In other words the “old style” shipping. The reason the index has over the past few years attracted the attention of analysts like me is that it provides a very good indicator of what is happening, on a global basis, to the shipping of raw materials.

However, like all index it works best when there is no externalities. Earlier in my career I was very involved in shipping finance – lots of colorful characters, but one of those ship owners told me that in his business, a single excess vessel is a glut of shipping capacity. In fact, he was just restating the sector's reality of very low demand elasticity; price rise dramatically when there is shortage, and fall equally dramatically when there is even a small surplus.

The Baltic dry peaked in early 2008 at 10,000 but today trades around 3,000. Several commentator have indicated that the fact that the BDI never recovered after the fall of early 2009 is a clear signal that there could be no V shape recover. Personally I never believed in V shape recover, most OECD economies are in deleveraging mode (or thinking about it) so there is less appetite for “stuff”. If the American consumer is going to begin saving some of his income it will have a dramatic impact on demand.


The reason that BDI is not moving relates partly to the strength of the index over the past 3 years; it takes 24 to 36 months to order and have a Panamax vessel delivered. Where as in the past the fleet of such vessels (all categories) was rising at a maximum of 40-60 vessels per month, not really a huge increase as the fleet capacity replacement rate is around 45, in 2010 the new vessels will average 120 per month. Poor demand elasticity means that even if there is a recover in raw material shipping the BDI will be a very poor indicator of recovery.

Analyst will have to find something new!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu