Skip to main content

The Baltic Dry Index

The Baltic Dry index is an interesting index, because it shows in real time the demand and supply for non-containerized goods transport. In other words the “old style” shipping. The reason the index has over the past few years attracted the attention of analysts like me is that it provides a very good indicator of what is happening, on a global basis, to the shipping of raw materials.

However, like all index it works best when there is no externalities. Earlier in my career I was very involved in shipping finance – lots of colorful characters, but one of those ship owners told me that in his business, a single excess vessel is a glut of shipping capacity. In fact, he was just restating the sector's reality of very low demand elasticity; price rise dramatically when there is shortage, and fall equally dramatically when there is even a small surplus.

The Baltic dry peaked in early 2008 at 10,000 but today trades around 3,000. Several commentator have indicated that the fact that the BDI never recovered after the fall of early 2009 is a clear signal that there could be no V shape recover. Personally I never believed in V shape recover, most OECD economies are in deleveraging mode (or thinking about it) so there is less appetite for “stuff”. If the American consumer is going to begin saving some of his income it will have a dramatic impact on demand.


The reason that BDI is not moving relates partly to the strength of the index over the past 3 years; it takes 24 to 36 months to order and have a Panamax vessel delivered. Where as in the past the fleet of such vessels (all categories) was rising at a maximum of 40-60 vessels per month, not really a huge increase as the fleet capacity replacement rate is around 45, in 2010 the new vessels will average 120 per month. Poor demand elasticity means that even if there is a recover in raw material shipping the BDI will be a very poor indicator of recovery.

Analyst will have to find something new!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...