Skip to main content

Canadian House price continue to rise

Look at the dichotomy between Canada and the U.S.  Between 2007 and 2010, house price in the U.S. fell by, on average, 29%, in Canada they are up by 6%.  One massive difference is income, whereas average income has been stagnating (some would say even falling once you remove health care) it has been rising in Canada.



The impact of this on the economy is two fold:  First, Canadian banks – the primary lenders to the housing sector are seeing few problem mortgages, and even if there are problems sales prices are sufficiently high to minimize losses (moreover in Canada a loan is a personal liability, any shortfall from the disposal of the property remains as a liability of the mortgagee).  Secondly, is spurs the new home construction industry, since demand keep s on growing, a result of Canada’s different aging factors and the continued growth in household formation.  It is difficult to believe, but U.S. household formation has dropped, over the past 5 years, from 600,000 per annum to just slightly more than 200,000.  While in Canada (1/10 the size of the US) household formation has remained constant in the 175,000 to 210,000 range for the past 4 years.

One question is always, are house prices, on an income basis, higher in Canada than in the U.S., despite the recent 29% drop in the U.S. and the 6% rise in Canada, the reality is that if you look at house prices from 1987 to 2010, Canadian house price index is lower than in the U.S.  However, if you use average income, then Canadian house prices are  remaining reasonable.  Moreover the U.S. figure for household income doesn't take into consideration the annual increase in health care costs, which have been growing at a double digit rate.

Housing market is "fully priced" by all accounts.  There is no doubt that Canada could easily face a pricing correction, especially if the Canadian dollar continue on its current trend.  However, the level of over-valuation is hard to estimate, it could be in the range of 5% to 20% (the more gloomy forecasters)





Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...