Skip to main content

What will the Bank of Canada do with 2.4% inflation?

Yesterday, Statics Canada reveled the inflation for Canada in the last month of the year.  The news was not so good, the CPI rose by 2.4% (annualized), the rise in prices was due in no small part to higher gasoline prices (+13% YoY), even core CPI was 1.6%, down from 2.1% last month.



Question is does the BoC need to do anything about this?  CPI inflation has moving higher, and (as can be seen above) away from the BoC's 2% mid range target, but within the scope of the BoC's recent reports.  In short not much, moreover its not clear that much can be done, since the price rise of raw material is exogenous to Canada.  Even if we have a recession in Canada, energy prices will not fall.  Moreover, Canadian PPI (producer price index) have been rising faster than the CPI -- for a year now, which indicates that Canadian companies are unable to pass-on some of the price increase they face, leading to margin compression.

Canada's currency remains above parity, despite oil price falling back to the $85/barrel range -- a strong currency acts as a growth dampening mechanism.  Maybe the BoC's best bet are the Canadian federal government's fiscal tools.  Banks are already cautious, in fact bank lending conditions only recently started easing (following the 2008/09 crisis), banks are under leveraged (excess capital), and short term interest rates are in the one year 75bps and two years 140 bps than in the U.S.  Moreover, the recent reduction in the term of Canadian mortgage (from 35 to 30 years) and the reduction in LTV on which banks can lend will have a dampening effect on Canadian consumption.

Since the BoC expected this small spike and have already seen many tightening measures implemented, it will  just have to wait for these moves to take effect.  One thing for sure, Canadian economic growth remains driven by demand and not quantitative easing, so the economy is fundamentally sound.

Turns out, there's nothing to see here!

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more