Skip to main content

What will the Bank of Canada do with 2.4% inflation?

Yesterday, Statics Canada reveled the inflation for Canada in the last month of the year.  The news was not so good, the CPI rose by 2.4% (annualized), the rise in prices was due in no small part to higher gasoline prices (+13% YoY), even core CPI was 1.6%, down from 2.1% last month.



Question is does the BoC need to do anything about this?  CPI inflation has moving higher, and (as can be seen above) away from the BoC's 2% mid range target, but within the scope of the BoC's recent reports.  In short not much, moreover its not clear that much can be done, since the price rise of raw material is exogenous to Canada.  Even if we have a recession in Canada, energy prices will not fall.  Moreover, Canadian PPI (producer price index) have been rising faster than the CPI -- for a year now, which indicates that Canadian companies are unable to pass-on some of the price increase they face, leading to margin compression.

Canada's currency remains above parity, despite oil price falling back to the $85/barrel range -- a strong currency acts as a growth dampening mechanism.  Maybe the BoC's best bet are the Canadian federal government's fiscal tools.  Banks are already cautious, in fact bank lending conditions only recently started easing (following the 2008/09 crisis), banks are under leveraged (excess capital), and short term interest rates are in the one year 75bps and two years 140 bps than in the U.S.  Moreover, the recent reduction in the term of Canadian mortgage (from 35 to 30 years) and the reduction in LTV on which banks can lend will have a dampening effect on Canadian consumption.

Since the BoC expected this small spike and have already seen many tightening measures implemented, it will  just have to wait for these moves to take effect.  One thing for sure, Canadian economic growth remains driven by demand and not quantitative easing, so the economy is fundamentally sound.

Turns out, there's nothing to see here!

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...