Skip to main content

Payroll inflation 3.5% YoY April 2010 to 2011

The title says it all, wage inflation is rising in Canada.  This blog (and many many others) have been concerned that the BoC ultra accommodative interest rate policy would cause wages to rise substantially faster than warranted.  In a sense, it is a good reflection of the CPI which as of April 2011 has risen by 3.7%, but it also means that the lag that one would expect between wage inflation and price inflation is absent (which makes no sense), there is a problem here that will have to be addressed sooner rather than later.  

A combination of factors  are at play here:

(1)  Canadian unemployment at 7.1% (and 6.1% if using American statistical methodology) is getting close to the historical average of 5.5%, 
(2)  The Bank of Canada has made certain assumptions about Canada's output gap (the difference between potential and actual GDP), which still assumes a 15% gap (Q4/10 data).  Several economists take the view that this doesn't take into consideration that certain jobs will never come back -- and therefore the BoC is overestimating the size of the output gap, which means that Canada's economy is operating near its potential.
(3)  A strong housing market has both given Canadian a sense of wealth but also a keen understanding as to how expensive housing has become in Canada -- Montreal, Toronto and Calgary  to an extent, but Vancouver and Victoria has seen house price which everywhere else in the world would be considered bubble territory.
(4)  Canada is more unionize than the U.S.  and unions still have broad popular support -- Canadians understand the role of unions and these have not yet been demonized (although the new SunTV -- a Canadian "Fox" is certainly trying), so they still weld bargaining powers, moreover skills mismatch may explain why Canadian company are ready to pay more for labor, they just cannot find cheaper qualified personnel.

In a nutshell the BoC has a problem:  personal credit and house price have entered problem areas, certain tools have recently been deployed to address the housing issue (reducing the term of loans and decreasing maximum leverage), but these tool are like very large ships and are slow to act.  Once the wage inflation genie is out of the bottle, redressing will require excessive monetary tightening.  Wages increases are just an additional data point, if any were required, that the BoC will soon have to act because of strong inflation pressures, due to purely Canadian factors. 

Of course comparison with the U.S. shows that wage inflation in Canada is almost twice that of the U.S., moreover, since most American face rapid medical insurance cost inflation (in Canada it is absorbed by the Government), the difference is in fact even higher.  Still Canadian companies faced with a cross border competitive environment are facing a dilemma, especially in light of Canada's recently strengthening currency.

The Governor of the Bank of Canada may be forced to take action sooner rather than later, my guess is that the BoC is overestimating the output gap (BTW a very common occurrence from past empirical analysis), and is now realizing the scope of the problem.  they may be forced to act more quickly in raising interest rate only as a reflection of growing wage inflation, discounting exogenous factors (U.S., Europe and China) and deal with the problem at hand.

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...