Skip to main content

Japan quantitative easing and trade wars?

My favourite flavour has always been geo-politics, I was never comfortable with pure economics, because economics is not really a science (sorry dad & Sis and mom too).  Using complex model that make massive behavioural assumption is a recipe for disaster...  case and point Japan.












Over the past 24 months the Japanese government has begun a massive inflation drive, and a massive devaluation push.  The Yen went from 90 to 110 to the dollar, but the impact on regional currencies has been even more dramatic.  Japan's objective is to create inflation -- so far its been unsuccessful. The means has been massive quantitative easing (e.g. government prints money) and with this cash they have been buying assets -- lots and lots of assets; MBS, bonds (short and long) stocks in a nutshell the Japanese government has depressed the printing button and have been printing Yens like crazy.  In the past 12 months they have issued $750 billion in new money - slightly more than what the US treasury did in 2008, but Japan's economy is a fraction of America's.  Its as if, every year, the US treasury injected US$ 3 trillion per annum.  The idea is that all this money will create inflation -- yes inflation did occur in May 2014 -- but 100% of this rise has been due to rise in sales taxes!! So that policy has not worked.

However, this massive cash injection has done three real things -- it has weakened the currency, its has increase government deficit and it has lead to a massive rise in the value of stocks.  For traders and investors this has been a one way sure thing.  The dominant trade of 2014 is"long Japan short yen" -- it has been one of the most profitable trade of all time.




Now, the impact to the real economy is something else.  First, as the region slows down (demand for goods produced in Japan -- or elsewhere) has slowed.  Excess labor in Japan -- despite a rapid population aging (and the corollary drop in working age population) has generated under-employment and income collapse, over the past 12 months income has shrunk by nearly 6%.



Despite the weaker yen (about 25%) industrial production is in free fall, because Japan's largest and most consistent market for goods and products is:  JAPAN!  A collapse in income means that demand has fallen.  The three pillars of Prime Minister Abe's have worked to weaken demand.  In a nutshell aside from traders and investors this strategy has been not only unproductive but has destroyed real economic value in Japan.



The prime minister's action were driven by a desire to re-create the Japan of the 70s where, like China, Japan's economic growth was driven by exports -- a cheaper yen and loose monetary policy should have been helpful, except that its target markets (Asia) have identical strategy -- grow through exports.  Despite what many commentators say, its impossible for everyone to be a net exporter.  The regional consequences here could be severe;  The risk here is to currency war and possibly a trade war.

That's serious



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...