Skip to main content

American Elections & the Republican conundrum

I remember about a year ago, the chairman of the GOP saying that they had a deep field of candidate for the 2016 presidential election; and then Donald Trump thru his hat in the ring...We are now in April 2016, and within the next few weeks (maybe days) the presumtive nominees for the Democrats and the Republican will be finalizes.  Ms Clinton with all her faults, real, perceived or simply made up, will almost certainly head up the Democrats.  For the GOP its still a choice between Trump and Cruz, but in reality neither are acceptable to the vast majority of the electorate -- so it really doesn't matter.

What is truly interesting is the impact on November's voters; some will vote only the down ticket, but in reality voters almost never vote the bottom of the ticket.  So my best guess is that a lot of Republicans will stay home in November, will hand the Democrats a victory on par with what Reagan got in the 1980's a 30/40 state victory -- this will be a historic defeat for the GOP; if its Trump (which is looking increasingly likely) the GOP will be able to say that it was not them, it was the nominee's fault -- giving them the ability to further deny reality of their failed policy, if its Cruz, I suspect they will still say its the candidate, but they will not be able to say that he was not at the very very right end of the spectrum.

This will at the very least hand the Senate back to the Democrats -- and may do the same for the house...although the house is, with all its gerrymandering, is harder to judge.

Maybe the GOP will change its ways.  The rise of Trump is entirely due to the GOP's historical habit of bait and switch; talk about values and middle america as the core of the economy, but then pass legislation that allows the 1% to off-shore their wage bill to lower cost jurisdiction and cut the 1% taxes even further.  In short the GOP has largely taken its voters for granted (BTW the Democrats have done the same with the african american vote too...), still Trump has clearly addressed these "core Americans' concerns"  (e.g. middle age blue collar white guys).  The press loves Trump, he gets about 85% of all press coverage.  His rallies are energies (and apparently violent).  

The GOP's conundrum is as follows:  After the 2012 defeat the GOP undertook a full review of its platform and what Americans were saying -- especially Republican Americans; and instead of following the script (Jeb Bush by the way) the GOP went full loco, full right wing crazy -- build a wall etc etc etc.  Granted the GOPs problem are even deeper; their willingness to gerrymander certain congressional seats means that there is an increasingly large number of representants that will not move an inch from their dogmatic position -- because they don't need to! They are elected by a minuscule subset of the electorate (in primaries) and then always win!  The GOP has no control on the selection process -- since all these campaigns are self funded (BTW that's what gave rise to Mr. Trump)

That's the GOP conundrum, the two front runners for the nominations are both deeply flawed candidates that the GOP establishment will easily dismiss as irrelevant; making the GOP unelectable for the foreseeable future.  Now I am not a republican (for starts I am not an American), still any political system who has a broken party is pray to massive problems.  The UK faced similar situation during the Thatcher years -- the labour party was unelectable, and so the system of check and balances fell apart.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more