Skip to main content

ETFs: Dicing mouse turds

The above expression is from Mauldin Economics about the ridiculousness of some ETFs fees. When I started my career many moons ago (like 25 years ago) brokerage fee were substantial, granted virtually no trading was electronic (Don't want to exaggerate either) but the reality is that until the "Big Bang" of 2007 brokerage cost were a substantial numbers.

To this day there remain closet indexers (Vanguard, Jarulosky & many many others) that will charge clients more than 1% in annual management fee, they will not on the other hand charge for each transaction.  The idea was that it would reduce churn (the number of time your broker sells shares from your portfolio to generate commission), but with fees becoming so low the cost of churn is also falling on ordinary (non-ETF) share transactions.  So the question investors have to ask is why bother with fixed commission since even if there is churn in your portfolio the costs are minimum.  Anyway, we are getting away from the real conversation.  ETFs are the pointy shiny bit of the market, its where all the trading is electronic -- machine driven trading occurs (and it has for years...).  Because ETFs are rule based investments -- there are no allocation discussion, limited hedging -- you are simply buying the underlying shares of the ETF.

The race to the bottom in the ETF segment (Exchange Tradable Funds) is the perfect example, with some ETF fee being as low as 0.04% -- so on $10,000 purchase your brokerage fee is $4.00 -- that's not a lot, in fact the firm issuing that ETF is probably losing money.

The issue for investors becomes what are you getting for your money?  That's the hard part, because liquidity and volatility redemption and new issuance are the name of the game; sure you like it when your ETF is trading near PAR (the value of the underlying shares), but what happens if it goes above PAR (don't laugh it happens -- especially for SPROT's Gold ETF), or trades at a discount...

You see dear investor the problem is always the same, when things are good, all these instruments are neat and tidy, when the "solids" hit the fan its much more complicated.

Anyway Mauldin's point is that with the ridiculously low fees that are now on offer from virtually all ETFs its harder for investors to choose because the low hanging fruits comparison are gone!


Have a good weekend

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more