Skip to main content

AI as Human Ressources

Imagine a world where tasks are assigned in a company by a sophisticated AI (Artifical intelligence) that instead of user preferences for certain employees use an elaborate system of staff selection?  It sounds improbable and far-fetched, but is actually real now! 

Imagine a very complex engineering project that has multiple areas of work and and work delegation outside of your expertise -- you are the team leader and are a material engineer specialist (Yeh that's what you know and trained -- but now you are the boss) when it comes to electrical issues you are less comfortable on the best employees and most efficient method of doing the job...guess what there is an intelligent system available TODAY for that.

A few months ago I was reading about Ocado that can fill 90% of  a grocery order in less than 5 minutes -- while a human would require 30 minutes (after some serious training...) This is not only a very repetitive task it's boring and subject to lots of error, while the robot doesn't get bored and works 24/7 -- great for these night owls who order at 2 am. 

What I am getting at here is that humans are quickly being replaced on the workspace.  Until now the executive suite thought that their jobs were secured, but I think that this is a false premise.  Too many times I observed absolutely stupid actions by CEO/CFO/COO that had less to do about the business and more about the ex-suites own comfort -- and politics.

The number of jobs that are going to take a hit is large.  The first will be the medical profession, simply because continual health monitoring is just around the corner (almost here with the iWatch 3) so that medical smart system will be able to analyze hundreds of data points that no doctor can evaluate.  Today's medical profession is like submarine drivers -- very few input that leads to certain conclusions.  Imagine having 1,000 datapoints over a 100 day period.  For a computer that's nothing for a human its impossible, the human will reject some data, he has too, the human brain has limited bandwidth.  Moreover, health care costs are rising and the best way to reduce medical costs is to prevent illness before it becomes a problem, and IA can do that rather well (apparently)

Taxi drivers are on their way out -- give it a few years and most decisions will be taken away from them too (in the name of efficiency)

Accounting profession since its too easy to replace rules with systems -- already 80% of all bills are sent electronically..

Mid-level management, secretarial staff is already going out of fashion a

Capital markets have long decided that the way forward is digital -- trading rooms have never been so busy, but the trader population is shrinking -- back and middle office too is getting wiped out!

Could we be seeing the end of work?  I don't know but it doesn't look good, and I don't see any profession (aside from scientists) that have a role that an AI cannot do better. 

Somewhat depressing if you think that we mostly define ourselves by our work



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...