Skip to main content

Special Elections: What they all mean

Last night was a disaster for the GOP, taking Pennsylvania's 18th district that was for the past 20 years a solid Republican stronghold (+20) became democratic.  Yes, the margin was razor thin, but the point is that the GOP, even with Trumps' poor rating should have won this seat.  This is a seat where the GOP usually wins with a 20% margin.  There are more than 100 seats in Congress that are more at risk than PA-18.

However, it is still hard to draw conclusions; the fact is that Lamb (the Democrat) won by less than 1% -- however, PA-18 is a largely electronic ballot district, so recount is out of the question, except for absentee and military ballots, and these account for less than the difference between the two candidates (a few hundred).

What is interesting here is that Lamb got 80% of the number of votes than his "no chance" predecessor, what is key is that his opponent Rick Saccone got only 53% of the number of votes that his predecessor got (who incidentally resigned after it emerged that he strongly encouraged a women with whom he was having an affair -- to have an abortion, when he was one of Congress' most vocal opponent to abortion -- under any circumstances).

On one side for the GOP the problem is that a lot of "Trump voters" in 2016 were first-time voters, and it appears (again its hard to be sure) that many GOP voters stayed home, despite the GOP spending a fortune in advertising.  Once again, the GOP's "chosen one" was less the inspiring; less of a Trump supporter more of a Tea party man, with a "difficult past".  It was partly a self-inflicted wound since he was largely unable to raise money (the GOP and PACs were the biggest spenders), moreover, his Democratic opponent was more to the right than most, had a spectacular resume and was well spoken.

Still, it remains that he only got 80% of the number of votes than did Hillary Clinton in 2016...that's a problem, because if in the midterms the GOP goes to vote, there will be no DNC wave later this year.  On the other hand, on the GOP side, some of the 100 GOP Congressmen may decide to bail before the midterm elections, that would be a huge problem for the GOP -- usually sitting Congressmen get re-elected.  If there is no incumbent the race becomes wide open.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...