So this morning I was reading Zero Hedge -- useful and weird source of financial news. This morning Bill Blain posted that Netflix was a Ponzi scheme. Frankly, I'm not certain that Bill understands what's a Ponzi scheme, nevertheless. So, there are three funny things in this post: (1) the aforementioned "Ponzi" scheme idea, (2) that there is both nothing to see on Netflix but that they spend too much money on content, and (3) That what on TV is better than Netflix. Now, a Ponzi scheme involves paying off old investors with new investor money. Since Netflix provides a service to more than 125 paying customers...not a Ponzi scheme, and since the company is making money (it seems that its net margin is around 10%) then on US$ 12 billion, it's not a bad business. So, its clear that Netflix is not, in fact, a Ponzi scheme (although its good clickbait -- if it was refuted elsewhere). The second issue is content, which I admit is less than fantastic at time...
Life of a Norfolk farmer