Skip to main content

Netflix and Zero Hedge

So this morning I was reading Zero Hedge -- useful and weird source of financial news.  This morning Bill Blain posted that Netflix was a Ponzi scheme. Frankly, I'm not certain that Bill understands what's a Ponzi scheme, nevertheless. 

So, there are three funny things in this post:  (1) the aforementioned "Ponzi" scheme idea, (2) that there is both nothing to see on Netflix but that they spend too much money on content, and (3) That what on TV is better than Netflix.

Now, a Ponzi scheme involves paying off old investors with new investor money.  Since Netflix provides a service to more than 125 paying customers...not a Ponzi scheme, and since the company is making money (it seems that its net margin is around 10%) then on US$ 12 billion, it's not a bad business. So, its clear that Netflix is not, in fact, a Ponzi scheme (although its good clickbait -- if it was refuted elsewhere).

The second issue is content, which I admit is less than fantastic at times -- but seriously better than what you get on Amazon, which is largely unchanged from month to month.  There are two issues here; first Netflix is really a video store -- does anyone remember how terrible most of the movies available at blockbuster really were?  Secondly, and this is sad, the fact that Netflix blocks VPN means that I no longer have access to Netflix France, Sweden and other parts of the world.  I saw epic series on these various Netflix -- that are sadly not available here.  I saw the complete Girl with the Dragon Tatoo (all three movies -- in Swedish with subtitles), and many many "local" shows.  But I understand Netflix's business model.

The last one is that the writer only watches Netflix if there's nothing good on TV...about six months ago I tried to watch live TV for the first time in two years.  It was not a happy experience, never again.

Finally, there is the idea that its insane for Netflix to spend US$ 7 billion on programming.  Insisting that this represents new client acquisition costs (forgetting the other 125 million subscribers!).  In fact, US$ 7 billion presents US$ 56 per subscriber, that pays annual fees of $120.00.  I actually call that really good if you consider that its entire distribution systems is a big hard drive and computers...


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Tariffs on inhabited Island

 Two seldom-visited islands, part of Australia, saw a massive increase in the tariffs they will face when exporting to the United States.   The 32,000 residents did not have much to say...being Penguines.   NO kidding, massive tariffs were imposed on Heard Island and McDonald Islands.  According to the Australian government, the last visitor to Heard was about a decade ago.   Never mind the 47% tariff on Madagascar, where the principal export is Vanilla and the GDP per capita is less than $500 a year. Not only a Stable Genus but evidently an administration that took all of two hours to proof the list of countries.    They also treated St Pierre & Miquelon, two islands part of France in the middle of the St Lawrence Gulf...
Post a Comment
Read more

Britain, France and Egypt

 The voters realize now that the Conservative Praty desire to return to 19th-century dominance has driven its hatred of the EU.  The voters realize now that departure from the EU has accelerated Britain's decline and may soon make it irrelevant.  At best it will have to kiss American arses to maintain its standing.  For this, the conservatives were punished.  The decline of Britain was inevitable, competition from Frankfurt and Germany in Finance was bound to grow.  The core of Europe (aka Germany) is aging quickly Macron seems to be winning his bet, the left alliance that won the legislative elections will not remain united for long, since they disagree on about everything.   The Far right though it was about to assume power is once again relegated to the back of the bus.   It may draw its own conclusions, but not all of these are good for France.  The far-right has won nearly 1/3rd of the electorate, that is not something to be ig...
Post a Comment
Read more