Skip to main content

Boeing, B737MAX and borrowings

Only 18 months ago, Boeing's reputation was good, sure it had screwed up its battle with Bombardier on the C-Series handing the project to Airbus that now has a full complement of aircraft from 100 seats all the way to 550 seats (ok ok the A380 is a financial quagmire).  Still, Boeing had the upper hand with the B777 and the B787 and the B737 was a dependable workhorse for short haul flights. 

In the space of 18 months throughout 2017 and 2018, Boeing repurchased nearly $20 billion worth of shares.  The impact has been dramatic on December 31, 2016, Boeing's share price was near US$ 155.  On March 1, 2019, the price of Boeing peaked at US$ 450.00 per share!  In the space of 18 months, the share price of the airline had trebled!  Since then it has lost nearly $100 per share!

The first "big" problem was the two accident that involved the B737MAX -- the savior aircraft for Boeing and its potential long term profit center.  Cheap to develop (all things considered) Boeing was able to adapt the most modern engine on an aging aircraft and wing set!  An engineering accomplishment for which it could be proud!

Then the trouble started, following the accident that appears to have been caused by faulty software (and poor training for the crew to identify the problem).  Then older issues came out, that Boeing was largely self-certified, a result of the US federal government cutting the FAA's certification budget to the bone.  Now there is a crisis of confidence, it is far from clear how and when the B737MAX will return in service.

Adding insult to injury are the lawsuits from Boeing customers.  This is a massive issue; one airline (a large B737MAX customer) has already begun proceedings, and they are unlikely to be the only ones.  However, now that the world is aware that unlike the European Boeing has been self-certifying for decades, other platforms will probably come under scrutiny (hello B787!).

Between 2017 and 2018 Boeing's management (and board) spent nearly US$ 20 billion buying back shares -- an activity that is certain to have contributed to the share price's spectacular rise!  Not only did the company use free cash flow, but it also borrowed substantial sums of money "for general corporate purpose" which is fine, but now Boeing is in trouble, the quality of its product has been found wanting (the entire fleet of B737MAX is grounded) and doubt is emerging on the "quality" of its workhorse the B787. 

It's still early to pass judgment, but it would appear that short term profit objectives were driving a lot of Boeing's decision over the past few years.  The massive buyback (it's a matter of public records) has left the company few resources in a time of crisis.  Knowing engineers way of working I am certain that there will be reams of memos outlining why keeping the "old wing" on the B737MAX was a massive error as it would dramatically change the aircraft balance.  A new wing could have cost more than US$ 1 billion, and have delayed the program by several years -- giving the A320NEO a huge advantage. 

Boeing's massive selling point was that the pilot was always in charge, the final authority, something that Airbus could not claim!  However, Boeing's extensive military experience with "unstable aircraft" which defines military aircraft, that have for years used software to assist the pilot was a very good base on which to control the balance problem; for unknown reasons Boeing decided not to disclose this aspect of the aircraft management system to new pilots that assumed (wrongly as it turns out) that the B737MAX would retain the type's old flying characteristics!   Via self-regulating the issue was approved by the FAA (which also lost a lot of feathers in this story)

I would not be entirely surprised to see "retirements" from the board and from the management of the company

Note:  I have no position in Boeing stocks either directly or indirectly.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu