Skip to main content

Boeing, B737MAX and borrowings

Only 18 months ago, Boeing's reputation was good, sure it had screwed up its battle with Bombardier on the C-Series handing the project to Airbus that now has a full complement of aircraft from 100 seats all the way to 550 seats (ok ok the A380 is a financial quagmire).  Still, Boeing had the upper hand with the B777 and the B787 and the B737 was a dependable workhorse for short haul flights. 

In the space of 18 months throughout 2017 and 2018, Boeing repurchased nearly $20 billion worth of shares.  The impact has been dramatic on December 31, 2016, Boeing's share price was near US$ 155.  On March 1, 2019, the price of Boeing peaked at US$ 450.00 per share!  In the space of 18 months, the share price of the airline had trebled!  Since then it has lost nearly $100 per share!

The first "big" problem was the two accident that involved the B737MAX -- the savior aircraft for Boeing and its potential long term profit center.  Cheap to develop (all things considered) Boeing was able to adapt the most modern engine on an aging aircraft and wing set!  An engineering accomplishment for which it could be proud!

Then the trouble started, following the accident that appears to have been caused by faulty software (and poor training for the crew to identify the problem).  Then older issues came out, that Boeing was largely self-certified, a result of the US federal government cutting the FAA's certification budget to the bone.  Now there is a crisis of confidence, it is far from clear how and when the B737MAX will return in service.

Adding insult to injury are the lawsuits from Boeing customers.  This is a massive issue; one airline (a large B737MAX customer) has already begun proceedings, and they are unlikely to be the only ones.  However, now that the world is aware that unlike the European Boeing has been self-certifying for decades, other platforms will probably come under scrutiny (hello B787!).

Between 2017 and 2018 Boeing's management (and board) spent nearly US$ 20 billion buying back shares -- an activity that is certain to have contributed to the share price's spectacular rise!  Not only did the company use free cash flow, but it also borrowed substantial sums of money "for general corporate purpose" which is fine, but now Boeing is in trouble, the quality of its product has been found wanting (the entire fleet of B737MAX is grounded) and doubt is emerging on the "quality" of its workhorse the B787. 

It's still early to pass judgment, but it would appear that short term profit objectives were driving a lot of Boeing's decision over the past few years.  The massive buyback (it's a matter of public records) has left the company few resources in a time of crisis.  Knowing engineers way of working I am certain that there will be reams of memos outlining why keeping the "old wing" on the B737MAX was a massive error as it would dramatically change the aircraft balance.  A new wing could have cost more than US$ 1 billion, and have delayed the program by several years -- giving the A320NEO a huge advantage. 

Boeing's massive selling point was that the pilot was always in charge, the final authority, something that Airbus could not claim!  However, Boeing's extensive military experience with "unstable aircraft" which defines military aircraft, that have for years used software to assist the pilot was a very good base on which to control the balance problem; for unknown reasons Boeing decided not to disclose this aspect of the aircraft management system to new pilots that assumed (wrongly as it turns out) that the B737MAX would retain the type's old flying characteristics!   Via self-regulating the issue was approved by the FAA (which also lost a lot of feathers in this story)

I would not be entirely surprised to see "retirements" from the board and from the management of the company

Note:  I have no position in Boeing stocks either directly or indirectly.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.