Skip to main content

The flawed F-35 and Canada's needs and expectations -- How the military industrial complex screwed the pooch

I've often written about the F35, Canada decided to purchase the aircraft to replace its fleet of aging CF-18 aircraft, and when I say aging, I mean really aging!  some aircraft are more than 20 years old.

The logic of buying the F35, what was touted by GD as the most advanced stealth aircraft in the world made some sense when looking at the war theater in Eastern Europe, that had dominated the news for some years prior.  As usual, the military was buying equipment for the last engagement.

The first and most important problem of the F35 was its cost, which was literally two orders of magnitude more than the CF18 that the Canadian armed forces had purchased int he 1970s and 1980s (and extensively refurbished in the 1990s).  the CF18 cost about 35 million apiece (in 1990's money) the F35 was nearer $500 million per aircraft.

The second problem is that the aircraft is a single engine (fewer parts) aircraft, for Canada that has extensive land (Northwest Passage etc) where airports are far and few between, the single-engine configuration produced a massive risk to pilots having engine problems

The new problems that have been revealed this week are even more serious since they have operational aspects:

The third problem derives from the single-engine configuration; the largest and most powerful military jet engine installed on the F35 creates structural issues when used at supersonic speeds -- both heating and ablation of the special stealth paint has reduced supersonic flights to minutes

The fourth problem is that the aircraft has a huge stability issue in the vertical flight profile that could lead to a total loss of control.

These are level 1 problems for the aircraft.

The fifth and most serious is that these aircraft can easily be replaced, for about 95% of all mission with drones, still expensive but more in the $20-40 million price bracket.

The sixth is the one less discussed; the main reason the Canadians were buying the F35 was to be able to communicate with the American forces with their high tech burst radios.  The US government decided that this type of burst radio would not be available to foreign air force...thereby removing one of the important reason for the acquisition of the F35.

So Canada has a problem, it has not yet received the aircraft, it has made depots on the aircraft but could still cancel the entire acquisition; Canada has to think what these aircraft are for, and in what role will be used; Canada's small wet navy cannot use the equipment, the size of Canada's arm forces reduces the effectiveness because the aircraft cannot do its principal foreign mission (against Russia and China) and moreover, is a poor substitute to drones for interdiction for Canada's northern border.

Another tough decision for Canada

P.S.  Canada has apparently known for some time that the aircraft has level 1 problems that will make it a poor participant in Canada's foreign mission.  Canada already knew that the aircraft was a poor solution to its domestic requirements...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process
Post a Comment
Read more

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki
Post a Comment
Read more

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu
Post a Comment
Read more