Skip to main content

Mexico's GDP growth

So the IMF things the magic number will be 0.9%, Citibanks things 1.4%, and HSBC 1.5%.  Who is right?  really not important, what is important is that growth is substantially lower than the 3% that AMLO was hoping to achieve in 2019 and 2020.  But this almost irrelevant

There are three issues here (1) Domestic generated growth, (2) foreign investor generated growth via investments and (3) US import driven growth.  AMLO has the ability to influence the first two; needless to say that over the past 12 months AMLO has made sure that foreign investors feel "unwelcomed", mainly because of his decision on "reforming" Mexico's energy sector -- the first is the shutting down of all new energy project.  Now for most builders a solar and wind farms the use of PPA -- where the government (via CFE) buys all the power is the easiest and cheapest; using a combination of export credit agency funding and private equity finding CFE has the ability to acquire energy.  It's simple and it relies entirely on the credit of the state-owned power company.  Moreover, export credit agency borrowing is a source of financing that the government of Mexico could not otherwise access.  Nevertheless, the government has decided to do something else...we don't know what yet but eventually.  The government has also decided to go to 'war" with the three companies that have spent nearly US$ 5 billion in building pipelines for natural gas.  They are almost certain to lose since the type of contract they are contesting is typical for these types of projects.

So AMLO has successfully antagonized the foreign business community, then made them think that they are even more ignorant in building Dos Bocas and canceling Mexico City's new airport.  Demonstrating its desire to ignore expert opinion.  It is AMLOs right to do as he pleases. 

AMLOs biggest decision is not to increase the government's borrowing, therefore, th4 only way he can meet his 4T (4th transformation) is to cut expenditure on "old" programs.  So far, Mexico has reduced expenses by nearly 30% -- cutting services and salaries, however, 100% of government spending is spent -- little is saved therefore the lower government spendings result directly in a contraction in GDP (Mexico's government expenses account for only 25% of GDP) nevertheless this has a negative impact on GDP growth.

The third impact on Mexico's GDP is what's happening in the North. -- the USA!  There things are getting weird.  Some days the press is saying everything is great, the next stats come out and the indicators are that the US economy is slowing down.  Again the indicators are on and off as to the state of the economy, the "bad news" has not been priced in.  Still for AMLO, the great risk is that US demands falter.  AMLO doesn't believe the IMF's 0.9% GDP growth forecast -- first, because there is no consequence to him saying such a thing, and secondly because fundamentally he doesn't care.

That is the overall issue for AMLO is all about power and politics, the rest is irrelevant


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...