Skip to main content

Blast from the past: Philippine Airlines in bancruptcy...again

 In the late 1990s, during the Asian Financial crisis, one of the oldest airlines in the region faced, like many of its neighbors' financial difficulties-- it needed to reorganize because its core business was being gravely affected and it had virtually no dry powder.  

One evening at home (then in Singapore) I get a call from the head of US Eximbank's aircraft finance division, we didn't know each other but through my colleagues, in NY he knew I was "his guy".  I had at that time a long experience in dealing with airline bankruptcy, manly regional carriers -- still.  

They were aware that Philippine Airline was about to stop lease payments on its aircraft because cash flow was severely depleted, caused by a sudden and dramatic reduction in its revenues -- mostly visiting friends and families that were at the core of its business model.

The next morning, after a 4-hour flight I was in the offices of Philippine Airlines, with its CEO, president, and finance director (who eventually became a very good friend).  I was the first, (the closest too) to be there and Exim was one of the airline's biggest creditors with its fleet of B747 aircraft.

They had not yet nominated a firm to act as an advisor in the bankruptcy and were initially trying to do a reorganization "on the cheap".  Considering the number and skill set of the main creditors (all European ECAs, Eximbank, and virtually every french bank) I voiced my concerns and suggested a number of groups that could help them.

They had no concept of DIP financing, the management was not aware that.

Since then (the airline was well recapitalized) the airline has operated successfully (its more than 20 years ago), and now faces similar headwinds.  Their solution is pragmatic -- get US$ 500 million in DIP finance, return excess (read older) aircraft and hope to weather the crisis.  I wish them luck and success -- Philippine airlines is a good carrier with a well maintained fleet.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will slap them with no-fly status. Update;  It seems that what they threw on the airc

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki