Skip to main content

To story so far


Over lunch yesterday with a friend we discussed the direction of the American economy.  I am naturally bearish and he is naturally bullish. So this lead to an interesting lunch. He asked me to articulate my thoughts and here they are:

I believe that the American economy faces heavy headwinds and that “business as usual” is just not on the cards.  Moreover, the American economy’s make up, imposes some real limits to future growth.

Over the past two decades, personal consumption as a percentage of GDP has trended upwards.  Looking back to the 80s and 90s personal consumption hovered around 60%.  In 2010 it reached 70% – it is much higher in the U.S. than in the rest of the OECD. Secondly, more than half of all adult Americans have FICO score of less than 600, prohibiting them from obtaining a mortgage.  Third, in some of America’s largest cities 8% of all homes are in default, where the home owners are channeling all expenditure away from mortgage payment to consumption.

What does this mean?

First, there is little scope for personal consumption to rise organically since it is already such a large percentage of GDP.  Second, over the next two years many Americans that today “consume” their mortgage payments will begin to pay rent – reducing their ability to consume. The housing overhang will last for another 24 to 36 months, and it is unclear how it will clear since so many Americans are no longer credit worthy.  Between 2002 and 2007 Americans have accessed their “home ATM” to meet their standard of living expectations.  While 8% of mortgages are in foreclosure, about 25% are “underwater” where the value of the outstanding mortgage either equal or exceeds the value of the home.  The home ATM source of disposable income for consumption has disappeared for good.  Therefore, business as usual for the consumer is just not on the cards

The other part of the equation is government spending, which is set to fall.  Federal, State and local governments account for about 25% of total GDP; whereas the Federal government is only now beginning to look at expenditure reduction, state and local governments have already facing to large budget deficits, and they are cutting.  BTW state governments account for about 2/3rd of all government expenses.  It is also important to note that several state have resorted to increase in taxes, further reducing disposable income.

Finally, and despite what the GOP is preaching, there is no way to balance the Federal budget without some revenue generation strategies. The GOP may oppose increase in income tax, but the reality is that sales taxes are almost certain to be needed to bridge the gap, moreover, it is a more ”egalitarian” form of taxation.  This will further reducing available income for consumption.  Yes Americans are inventive, but it remains that a federal government that has a deficit equal to 10% of the GDP will have to take action soon, rather than later. 

I am reluctant to get into the argument for growth in the private sector, but one aspect resonate across many sectors, while net profits continue to improve top line revenues remain sluggish.  American corporations have become master at the art of cutting costs, but there’s a limit to this strategy (although Q1/2011 performance has been spectacular).  Most American companies have indicated a reluctance to increase employment, until they see an upward sign in sales activities.

For all these reasons, headwinds for the American economy remain heavy.  Moreover, one crisis (either in America or elsewhere) could cause systemic tension to explode.  

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu