Skip to main content

National Security & Trump

Well this takes the cake!


Flynn fell on his sword (you knew it was going to happen when "the President supports Michael Flynn" line came across the wire). The implication is potentially very serious. There is no doubt that the FBI took their sweet time in investigating this problem. The problem is this: When did the President know and what did he know (these words made famous by the Watergate scandal).

Right now Flynn is gone, fine and good, but one has to wonder why he would have gone to the Russian on his own without the approval of his boss. Today, Zero hedge, a news site that has known "pro-Russia" positions when to some length to say that "there is no evidence" provided by the media that the relationship between the Trump campaign and Russia was anything real/bad or that the Russians were giving orders to the Trump camp.

Hmmm, a news site "bitching" about the lack of "proof" from the media! Journalists have hatted Trump from the very start -- granted they are often prima donna's but it remains that Trump has gone out of his way to antagonize the fifth estate. He should not be surprised that they are gunning to bring him down. They know he's a hack and not very prepared or really that interested in this role of President. Once again Trump has made the news on Israel -- where the two state solution may no longer be part of the peace solution -- will this be like the Jerusalem Embassy thing -- a quick easy statement that will have to be re-visited in two days?

The problem for the Trump administration is that the comments about the Trump camp going all the way back to the nomination convention (where the Trump team made a bit change to the party's platform on Russia -- the only change they requested) and when there seems to have been computers talking directly from the Trump camp to certain Russian banks, to Flynn's talking to the Russian Ambassador. That Russia didn't react to the expulsion of one of its diplomats (somewhat unusual) indicates that Russia expected much more favorable treatment from a Trump White House than it got from Obama.

All this stuff around Russia/Trump is serious stuff (we are talking treason here) and Flynn would have know that! He must have been pressured by someone (maybe Trump) to go and reassure the Russians. The more you think of what Flynn did the less it looks like a "rogue agent" move, and more of a plan administration project.

In foreign affaires the whole thing has been a dog's breakfast -- first Taiwan -- 10 days later Trump re-affirmed the "one China" policy, then there was the Jerusalem Embassy -- again walked back, the very poorly written immigration presidential act -- which got a 3-0 thumbs down from the court of appeal. Now this Russian problem that will probably not go away -- first because the FBI/CIA/NSA are all investigating. Come-on, if you just watched the West Wing you know that all communication between certain key people in the US and the Russian/Chinese are monitored. What kind of dumbass doesn't know that! They made an episode about it...

So far, Trump's success have been few and far between:

Reform/cancellation of the ACA NO -- frankly the GOP has no idea of what to do!
Massive infrastructure program -- No
Piss off Mexico/Australia/Germany --yeah he did do that
Tax reform -- Next two weeks...its going to be great
TTP agreement -- cancelled he did do that!
Recognized Taiwan -- did that but 10 days later re-affirmed the one china policy, screwing Taiwan
Reopen NAFTA Yep he did do that. Didn't count of Canada's enthusiastic support
Asked the VP to examine how the election was stolen. GOP congress told him (again) to take a hike
Russia -- could be nothing could be a Watergate, right now its bad but not terrible, but many are digging...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…